Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v88une$k3p0$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:40:14 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <v88une$k3p0$3@dont-email.me> References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net> <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me> <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7rclq$1r24r$2@dont-email.me> <lgdac6F3c6aU4@mid.individual.net> <v80bju$2s7ns$2@dont-email.me> <lgi05eFq6vhU2@mid.individual.net> <v80j93$2nqsm$5@dont-email.me> <lgildlFtal2U1@mid.individual.net> <v85r6s$mgr$1@dont-email.me> <lgni5gFl7shU3@mid.individual.net> <v87gf2$d1eu$1@dont-email.me> <lgpqjfF17veU1@mid.individual.net> <v88jf8$j1j9$1@dont-email.me> <v88sjt$hbk9$1@solani.org> <v88uk9$ksba$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:40:15 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3eb9958d5eea0c84948681d44f52d8dc"; logging-data="659232"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vbe/uggu4neABwem63mvuQ9LarAA9ss4=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FJER1A06FPCYHeZNDifXJ9wiGFc= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <v88uk9$ksba$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2780 On 2024-07-29 13:38, Chris wrote: > On 29/07/2024 21:04, badgolferman wrote: >> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2024-07-29, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Actually, a human being does review it with Google's system: >>> >>> I was unclear. I'm not saying a human doesn't review, I'm saying that >>> given >>> the dozens/hundreds of images of suspected abuse images they review a >>> day >>> they won't have the ability to make informed decisions. >>> >>>> --- >>>> A human content moderator for Google would have reviewed the photos >>>> after they were flagged by the artificial intelligence to confirm they >>>> met the federal definition of child sexual abuse material. >> >> What kind of a person would want this job? > > I read an article a couple of years ago on the Facebook content > moderators. Many ended up traumatised and got no support. God it was a > grim read. I think I recall that as well.