Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 09:52:21 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v8a2j5$u4t6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v887np$gl15$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:52:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="329af3d797696bf444d9a1dc8986292a";
	logging-data="988070"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Hgd2KIIMFSo4XzvAMUa2D"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wM3ZAyJ1/rS+oyBNSS6K8j74d0M=
Bytes: 1317

On 2024-07-29 14:07:53 +0000, olcott said:

> HHH(Infinite_Recursion) and HHH(DDD) show the same non-halting
> behavior pattern in their derived execution traces of their
> inputs.

Hard to believe as their behaviour is so different and you don't
say what pattern the see. Of course, because the traces are
incomplete it is possible to see a pattern that actually is not
there. But does that really happen?

-- 
Mikko