Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Doctor Who villain spotting
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:45:02 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <v8acmq$vp13$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v862pr$21pj$1@dont-email.me> <v87p12$ed2e$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oow9x6gtnfrn003@post.eweka.nl> <v888gp$h0vp$1@dont-email.me>
 <v888t8$2mjk$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:44:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="065581322bc2dac0334aa674a1b94c1a";
	logging-data="1041443"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19r5l1oaypfth8DL0uuNDGpBQVmVw+CSVw="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eCeynK1nL4QE65j9COKVj0YiZjE=
In-Reply-To: <v888t8$2mjk$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2236

The Doctor wrote on 30/7/24 12:27 am:
> In article <v888gp$h0vp$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 29/7/24 11:17 pm:
>>> Daniel70 wrote:
>>>> solar penguin wrote on 29/7/24 5:07 am:
>>>>> Thus spake solar penguin:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW fans of Porridge might be interested that Brian Wlde plays
>>>>>> a prison officer, over a decade before Mr Barroclough.
>>>>>
>>>>> That should be ‘Wilde.’ Sorry for the typo. Hope it didn’t cause
>>>>> too much confusion.
>>>>>
>>>> AH!! So you and Gobble-de-gook must be psychically connected as HE,
>>>> apparently, knew exactually to whom you refered!!
>>>
>>> Being physically connected to Dave doesn't sound very nice at all...
>>>
>> Yes, it would ..... but 'physically' WASN'T the word I used. .... and I
>> HAD to go DDG'ing to make sure I was using the appropriate word!
> 
> grammar checker working?
> 
No, Gobble-de-gook, *DICTIONARY* not grammer checker!!
-- 
Daniel