| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v8ctus$1h744$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:51:40 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 47 Message-ID: <v8ctus$1h744$1@dont-email.me> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <v82amn$3acnb$2@dont-email.me> <nnNQiU97cYPJ7ikub_NQj-NjNiA@jntp> <v87lpn$dsd3$1@dont-email.me> <QLZ_2ACRhG592HBeU_Y-pOZfUzY@jntp> <v8a4jn$ufis$1@dont-email.me> <CFttuDVUlX6AnVwOZ2ia1BkP6nc@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:51:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d60a70f0267de6362ef96fe73a3ae1f3"; logging-data="1612932"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IE28zjWfTwQ/kJ7qPQhfc" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:8KeOR+X/wgQLM0auKRH8z0ryWXU= Bytes: 2901 On 2024-07-30 14:41:15 +0000, WM said: > Le 30/07/2024 à 09:26, Mikko a écrit : >> On 2024-07-29 13:15:36 +0000, WM said: >> >>> Le 29/07/2024 à 11:01, Mikko a écrit : >>> >>>> He also notes that what we have learned from finite quatities does >>>> not apply to infinity. >>> >>> Unit fractions are isolated. They have distances. The function "unit >>> fractions between 0 and x" can nowhere grow by more than 1. >> >> The number of unit fractions between 0 and x is infinite > > Not for every x. The context where you mentioned unit fractions was a discussion about Galileis opinions. At that time the concept of quantity did not include absurd quantities and usually not zero, either. Therefore the expression "unit fractions between 0 and x" should be interpreted to assume that x > 0. Of course if x is zero there is nothing between 0 and x. > Growth by more than 1 is contradicting mathematics. > ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0. Note the universal quantifier. Irrelevant. But do you mean that 0 is not in ℕ? >> and the number of unit fractions between 0 and y is infinite. Whether one >> infinity is bigger or smaller than another infinity is not answerable merely >> on the basis of our experinece about finite quantities but only after a >> carful analysis if at all. > > If (0, x) is a subset of (0, y), the relative quantities are clear. As Galilei pointed out, it is not. That one is a subset of the other makes one look bigger but the existence of a bijection between the two makes them look equal. Bot appearences cannot be true, so the clarity is a hallusination. However, although Galilei was happy with all infinities being equalt there is a way out, and in fact more than one way: at least cardinals, ordinals, and measures, perhaps something else. -- Mikko