Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8ctus$1h744$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:51:40 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <v8ctus$1h744$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <v82amn$3acnb$2@dont-email.me> <nnNQiU97cYPJ7ikub_NQj-NjNiA@jntp> <v87lpn$dsd3$1@dont-email.me> <QLZ_2ACRhG592HBeU_Y-pOZfUzY@jntp> <v8a4jn$ufis$1@dont-email.me> <CFttuDVUlX6AnVwOZ2ia1BkP6nc@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:51:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d60a70f0267de6362ef96fe73a3ae1f3";
	logging-data="1612932"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IE28zjWfTwQ/kJ7qPQhfc"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8KeOR+X/wgQLM0auKRH8z0ryWXU=
Bytes: 2901

On 2024-07-30 14:41:15 +0000, WM said:

> Le 30/07/2024 à 09:26, Mikko a écrit :
>> On 2024-07-29 13:15:36 +0000, WM said:
>> 
>>> Le 29/07/2024 à 11:01, Mikko a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> He also notes that what we have learned from finite quatities does
>>>> not apply to infinity.
>>> 
>>> Unit fractions are isolated. They have distances. The function "unit 
>>> fractions between 0 and x" can nowhere grow by more than 1.
>> 
>> The number of unit fractions between 0 and x is infinite
> 
> Not for every x.

The context where you mentioned unit fractions was a discussion about
Galileis opinions. At that time the concept of quantity did not include
absurd quantities and usually not zero, either. Therefore the expression
"unit fractions between 0 and x" should be interpreted to assume that
x > 0. Of course if x is zero there is nothing between 0 and x.

> Growth by more than 1 is contradicting mathematics.
> ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0. Note the universal quantifier.

Irrelevant. But do you mean that 0 is not in ℕ?

>> and the number of unit fractions between 0 and y is infinite. Whether one
>> infinity is bigger or smaller than another infinity is not answerable merely
>> on the basis of our experinece about finite quantities but only after a 
>> carful analysis if at all.
> 
> If (0, x) is a subset of (0, y), the relative quantities are clear.

As Galilei pointed out, it is not. That one is a subset of the other
makes one look bigger but the existence of a bijection between the two
makes them look equal. Bot appearences cannot be true, so the clarity
is a hallusination.

However, although Galilei was happy with all infinities being equalt
there is a way out, and in fact more than one way: at least cardinals,
ordinals, and measures, perhaps something else.

-- 
Mikko