Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v8d1v9$1htak$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: [article] Doctor Who: Has the Disney Gamble Paid Off? Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:00:06 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 55 Message-ID: <v8d1v9$1htak$1@dont-email.me> References: <xn0ooil8930w5xu000@post.eweka.nl> <iTXpO.416688$7xg2.6271@fx14.ams4> <v89sge$tag$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v8ac3h$vmte$1@dont-email.me> <v8aq7l$1scv$7@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:00:10 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fafd486a24955fb3498087208ccba475"; logging-data="1635668"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19KaQRo8+MnmQvgWK21HgMfvs8j9NqT2lA=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:mp4z0ZWdzt3GB0ZyGSkf4HvZ8IU= In-Reply-To: <v8aq7l$1scv$7@gallifrey.nk.ca> Bytes: 3383 The Doctor wrote on 30/7/24 11:35 pm: > In article <v8ac3h$vmte$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 > <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> The Doctor wrote on 30/7/24 3:08 pm: >>> In article <iTXpO.416688$7xg2.6271@fx14.ams4>, Hornplayer9599 >>> <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote: >>>> On 7/29/2024 11:58, Blueshirt wrote: >>>>> solar penguin wrote: >>>>>> The idiot insisted: >>>>>>> In article <xn0oow9tjgti633001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt >>>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Science 1 Bible 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wrongo boyo! Science is sunbject to the bible. >>>>>> >>>>>> In that case, please show us where in the Bible we can >>>>>> find Newton’s Second Law of Motion and the chemical >>>>>> formula for ammonia. >>>>> >>>>> Stop! Dave was repeatedly asked by people here to provide a >>>>> chapter/verse to back-up one of his infamous biblical claims >>>>> a couple of months ago. We are still waiting for the >>>>> relevant reference point. That man hasn't a clue about the >>>>> bible. >>>>> >>>>> I know more about his bible than he does and I'm a Atheist! >>>> >>>> And the more I hear Dave misquote, and misrepresent what is >>>> actually in the Bible (and WHERE in the Bible things are), the >>>> more I'm convinced that he's one of these self-ordained >>>> nutcases who really doesn't know the Bible, and just warps >>>> scripture in any shape he needs it to be in in order to suit >>>> his needs at the moment; that's why he can't defend what he >>>> says, and tries to deflect and change the subject. As a >>>> Christian, that irritates me. >>> >>> So which is your version of the Holy bible? >>> >>> I chhose the KJV. >> >> Why should it matter WHAT Version of The Bible one uses, >> Gobble-de-gook?? >> >> The basic message should be the same IN EVER VERSION OF THE >> BIBLE!! > > Then you know nothing about the Satanic counterfeits of the Holy > Bible and Revised versions. Yeap .... and, as the King James Version ONLY came into existance thanks to King James, IT must be one of those "Satanic counterfeits' RIGHT, Gobble-de-gook?? -- Daniel