Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v8egli$1q41l$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Stealing a Great Idea from the 6600 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 23:17:06 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <v8egli$1q41l$1@dont-email.me> References: <dd1866c4efb369b7b6cc499d718dc938@www.novabbs.org> <da6dc5fe28bb31b4c73d78ef1aac2ac5@www.novabbs.org> <sdl82jpkpf1t0ctr8sgqm5bvqqireg08j5@4ax.com> <44fdd1209496c66ba18e425370a8b50d@www.novabbs.org> <ks8e2j1kquqpcupcgh32es7nci33nlajid@4ax.com> <ec69999967361c286afdbe60bc2443ea@www.novabbs.org> <dtel2j5kipf6tj9cabgp7pqk8eei14eo1a@4ax.com> <v0euek$3a2rc$1@dont-email.me> <ff78aaa73101509100f09f190838a2a7@www.novabbs.org> <IQSWN.4$nQv.0@fx10.iad> <v0jlf3$i3mh$2@dont-email.me> <3458ae0a6b7c1f667ef232c58569b5e1@www.novabbs.org> <v0k2kb$l21r$1@dont-email.me> <58f8e9f6925fd21a5526ea45fae82251@www.novabbs.org> <v0kodk$t520$1@dont-email.me> <v0ksrk$u1j2$1@dont-email.me> <v0l35j$v8sl$1@dont-email.me> <v0l3gm$vbr3$1@dont-email.me> <v0l5ou$vnf8$1@dont-email.me> <v0m6ce$17634$1@dont-email.me> <v87e1c$ciku$1@dont-email.me> <v88jlh$j2v6$1@dont-email.me> <v89gb2$rb1o$2@dont-email.me> <v89nbp$s6m5$1@dont-email.me> <v8bu95$18cmh$1@dont-email.me> <v8c1s0$18u9o$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 01:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f3073cdcc778f11e69aa61b90c869b12"; logging-data="1904693"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yIv+ddW5gAqDUgD88f7J3" User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5CsmrJpaher/XCIjQH23MrCEmwM= Bytes: 2577 On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:52:14 -0500, BGB wrote: > On 7/30/2024 6:51 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:40:39 -0500, BGB wrote: >> >>> If a file has not been modified, and was already confirmed good, you >>> don't really need to verify it again... >> >> How do you tell whether it’s been modified or not, without actually >> examining its entire contents? > > If one is already intercepting every filesystem call, it is possible to > keep track of whether a given file was opened for writing, deleted, > written to, ... Unless, of course, someone else is also intercepting those calls, and inserting their own calls.