Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8fehe$22ege$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict
 correctly
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:46:53 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <v8fehe$22ege$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v887np$gl15$1@dont-email.me> <v8a2j5$u4t6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8asse$12hr3$2@dont-email.me> <v8aukp$12grj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8b00m$12ojm$1@dont-email.me> <v8bchs$15ai5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8bh32$15une$1@dont-email.me>
 <d89f03c5a605f010ec3c83c50137b983dc85848e@i2pn2.org>
 <v8bl2j$16ibk$2@dont-email.me> <tiuiaj5jf0jqcfcfntko5hufisp8mb93bm@4ax.com>
 <v8bu91$18b7k$2@dont-email.me>
 <ddb7a467da20b6a6bd90aee9735a62ae68cac50e.camel@gmail.com>
 <v8f0ni$204k7$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 09:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c0ac17c3f9e00decd2248743b2f1a16";
	logging-data="2177550"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vVaTRCBkoRAHPZcae3U0a"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QAi13Fbn+hniZmgpsx3ovvHASvw=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v8f0ni$204k7$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2437

Op 01.aug.2024 om 05:51 schreef olcott:
> On 7/31/2024 10:08 PM, wij wrote:
>> On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 18:50 -0500, olcott wrote:
>>>
>>> It is not supposed to be a general solution to the halting problem.
>>> it only shows how the "impossible" input is correctly determined
>>> to be non halting.
>>>
>>
>> But how do you determine it is non-halting?
>>
>> As I know you are even unable to define what 'halt' mean !!!
>>
> I have done this thousands of times and after someone
> has read these thousands of times they say that I never
> said it once.
> 
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
>    return;
> }
> 
> int main()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
> }
> 
> If DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
> reach its return instruction then it never halts.
> 
> 

But a correct simulation is impossible. HHH cannot possibly simulate 
itself correctly.
So you made the same error thousands of times.
You never showed a correct definition.