Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8gbe4$288f9$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: This function proves that only the outermost HHH examines the
 execution trace
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:00:04 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <v8gbe4$288f9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v80h07$2su8m$3@dont-email.me>
 <0amdndFJSZSzYD77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v8102f$2vo8u$1@dont-email.me> <v83fhe$3gihn$1@dont-email.me>
 <v83hmk$3gvj7$1@dont-email.me> <v83jc9$3gihm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v83juc$3ham9$1@dont-email.me> <v8519e$3s7bv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v88h9e$i7kl$7@dont-email.me> <v8a31r$u7n5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8btl5$184u7$3@dont-email.me> <v8cval$1hf7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8dshi$1mg72$4@dont-email.me> <v8fes7$22of5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8fti6$24rl1$8@dont-email.me> <v8g0el$24u77$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8g0lr$25l0a$8@dont-email.me>
 <3e91ca7ef46d6de40edf2bbd9d4761ba63578e09@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 18:00:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3121e7e48560b53e45601f59b50fa691";
	logging-data="2367977"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18UUoXbMTz4gbK3UYbUuIaZ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iglBAkea6tkhXN129NF7Xz1Ot1A=
In-Reply-To: <3e91ca7ef46d6de40edf2bbd9d4761ba63578e09@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3033

On 8/1/2024 10:46 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Thu, 01 Aug 2024 07:56:27 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 8/1/2024 7:52 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 01.aug.2024 om 14:03 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 8/1/2024 2:52 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-07-31 17:33:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>> On 7/31/2024 4:15 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-07-30 23:40:21 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>> On 7/30/2024 2:00 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-07-29 16:50:53 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/28/2024 3:59 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-07-27 20:05:31 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>>>> When instructions are executed/emulated according to the semantics of
>>>> the x86 language then they are executed/emulated correctly.
>>>>
>>> But only those instructions. A halting program is simulated correctly
>>> if no instructions are skipped.
>>
>> Correctly and completely are not the same damn thing you
>> freaking moron.
> Yes, an incomplete simulation is also incorrect.
> 

When N steps of DDD are emulated correctly one can only
say that N steps were not emulated correctly when one
is a liar.

When a correct and complete emulation is impossible
because the computation has no end then it is pretty
damn stupid to insist an a complete emulation.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer