Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:03:27 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <v8gt6v$2coqq$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7ofe7$17h8r$6@dont-email.me>
 <v7qfu0$1m6vf$1@dont-email.me> <v7r040$1onhe$3@dont-email.me>
 <v7vlbj$2ofet$1@dont-email.me> <v80a2u$2rabc$4@dont-email.me>
 <v825jo$39i9l$1@dont-email.me> <v82u9d$3dftr$3@dont-email.me>
 <v8306v$3c7$1@news.muc.de> <v83161$3dftr$11@dont-email.me>
 <v84udt$3rp4t$1@dont-email.me> <v8bc6j$159av$1@dont-email.me>
 <ea673a5b4ed43fbddf938c69bd013b0cf2ca325d@i2pn2.org>
 <v8c6kb$1de3l$1@dont-email.me>
 <9f3112e056ad6eebf35f940c34b802b46addcad4@i2pn2.org>
 <v8cde0$1ecgo$1@dont-email.me> <v8ctgt$1gbu7$4@dont-email.me>
 <v8dkc3$1kii7$3@dont-email.me> <v8e55v$1nrnh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8e9vu$1oqd7$1@dont-email.me> <v8fftq$22ege$3@dont-email.me>
 <v8fuj5$24rl1$10@dont-email.me> <v8g1j7$24u77$6@dont-email.me>
 <v8g2jl$26d7d$1@dont-email.me> <v8g5oq$26s53$5@dont-email.me>
 <v8g658$276fl$1@dont-email.me>
 <9d2f2d8a1bf9614b9d8ab56bd500a78075b365e4@i2pn2.org>
 <v8gdan$288f9$2@dont-email.me> <v8gnoo$2bb0i$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 23:03:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3121e7e48560b53e45601f59b50fa691";
	logging-data="2515802"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Tvyz+8N0sAQXthlLMHHkw"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6UGW6ODThBMdhbEPvxU7m/iiVO4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v8gnoo$2bb0i$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4832

On 8/1/2024 2:30 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 01.aug.2024 om 18:32 schreef olcott:
>> On 8/1/2024 11:11 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Thu, 01 Aug 2024 09:30:00 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 8/1/2024 9:23 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 01.aug.2024 om 15:29 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 8/1/2024 8:12 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 01.aug.2024 om 14:20 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 8/1/2024 3:10 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Op 31.jul.2024 om 23:23 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/2024 3:01 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Op 31.jul.2024 om 17:14 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/2024 3:44 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 31.jul.2024 om 06:09 schreef olcott:
>>>
>>>>>>> The trace stops and hides what happens when 000015d2 is called.
>>>>>>> Olcott is hiding the conditional branch instructions in the
>>>>>>> recursion.
>>>>>> These next lines conclusively prove that DDD is being correctly
>>>>>> emulated by HHH after DDD calls HHH(DDD).
>>>>> It also shows that HHH when simulating itself, does not reach the end
>>>>> of its own simulation.
>>>> If you weren't a clueless wonder you would understand that DDD 
>>>> correctly
>>>> emulated by HHH including HHH emulating itself emulated DDD has no end
>>>> of correct emulation.
>>
>>> It does if the simulated HHH aborts, but its simulating copy preempts
>>> that. Indeed, it has no choice, but if it didn't abort, the simulation
>>> wouldn't abort either. Therefore it can't simulate itself.
>>>
>>
>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>>      If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
>>      until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
>>      stop running unless aborted then
>>
>>      H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
>>      specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
>> </MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
> 
> Sipser agreed only to a correct simulation.

of N steps.

>>
>> I spent two years carefully composing the above before I even
>> asked professor Sipser to review it.
>>
>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH until HHH sees the same
>> never ending pattern that anyone else can see.
> 
> The never ending pattern is there only in your dreams. The HHH that 
> halts after two cycles has a halting pattern. 

In order for DDD correctly emulated by HHH to halt
DDD correctly emulated  must reach its emulated "ret"
instruction. This <is> impossible.

> Only HHH, when simulating 
> itself, cannot see that after two cycles, because it needs one more cycle.
> Two is not infinite.
> Dream are no substitute for facts, not for logic.
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer