Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v8iisj$2qb44$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: DECNet, was: Re: Viewing SSH users on VMS Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 12:19:32 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <v8iisj$2qb44$2@dont-email.me> References: <v83b3h$3c2fu$1@dont-email.me> <dcadcb05751d075777494f05153fb7170358ef40@i2pn2.org> <v8dot6$1isug$1@dont-email.me> <v8e089$1isug$2@dont-email.me> <7c5c2e75afa505b5c6bce9af338f9526412532a8@i2pn2.org> <lh1ciiFctr6U1@mid.individual.net> <v8g2s6$26c24$1@dont-email.me> <lh1qntFctr6U2@mid.individual.net> <v8h42f$2e5g0$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 14:19:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="209177095d249675c2cff63b2ce31923"; logging-data="2960516"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ieaE7TeVKjAH/obtUtXfGAHLJF3tWKuE=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wbHwkKiM3pG7wq0/Buk3Q0bpil4= On 2024-08-01, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 12:17:00 -0400, bill wrote: > >> On 8/1/2024 9:33 AM, Robert A. Brooks wrote: >>> >>> On 8/1/2024 8:15 AM, bill wrote: >>>> >>>> Could that be that VMS either does or intended SSH to be usable over >>>> DECNET where there would not have been an IP address? >>> �No. >> >> OK. I guess it was just wishful thinking. :-) > > What kind of person wishes they could use DECnet? ;) Don't ask Lawrence. :-) There are way too many people around here who seem to think it's still OK to use DECnet these days... I don't know if you saw the postings, but I actually found some dodgy stuff in DECnet Phase IV a couple of years ago. Things that were not immediately obviously exploitable, but stuff that still should not be there, such as a fully-privileged EVL or the ability to crash EVL remotely using a malformed packet. I wonder if VSI ever got around to fixing the list of DECnet Phase IV issues I sent them. I am assuming not because I never heard anything back from them to say they had fixed them. Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.