Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8jkp3$312tq$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Marcury has a layer of diamond 10 miles thick, NASA
 spacecraft finds
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 00:00:39 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <v8jkp3$312tq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8agal$i5bk$1@solani.org>
 <ik9iaj9g0jp202thk66cgaeh0d24j380af@4ax.com> <v8cjsm$j8ps$1@solani.org>
 <MPG.411449149ba41b6d989fb8@news.eternal-september.org>
 <v8gd3o$28fgc$1@dont-email.me>
 <MPG.4115b6bd8518b0ab989fba@news.eternal-september.org>
 <v8iihu$2q9s6$1@dont-email.me>
 <MPG.4116b70514d8508c989fbb@news.eternal-september.org>
 <v8j0d5$2t70j$1@dont-email.me>
 <MPG.411719d1152a3787989fbd@news.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 23:57:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4a944541d791877ab2a58df9a3920524";
	logging-data="3181498"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189ajaC7ijQ91mYc9XgXhQm"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fObCdKvkUqHGFJwTka7eX0m4q3k=
In-Reply-To: <MPG.411719d1152a3787989fbd@news.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2833

On 8/2/24 23:29, Ralph Mowery wrote:
> In article <v8j0d5$2t70j$1@dont-email.me>, bill.sloman@ieee.org says...
>>>
>>>   From what I could find in a quick search the industrial diamonds are
>>> only about 10 to 20 dollars per carat versus the several thousand dollars
>>> the jewel  quality ones would cost.  That is where I base my
>>> 'worthless' price at.
>>
>> Cheap isn't the same as worthless.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> My bad choice of words.  I should have said something more like they are
> not worth much money.  They are very useful in industry, just do not
> cost anything at all like the jewelery ones.
> 
> Years ago I had an uncle that worked for a brick company and he used a
> saw to cut the bricks for samples.  He had saved a jar full of diamonds
> that came off the saw blades.  Thought he had some big money comming to
> him.  Found out that that whole jar would only sell for a few dollars.
> 
> 
> 

Diamond is amazing. We had this benchtop wheel grinder to shape and
sharpen steel turning tools, and somebody had tried to grind a piece
of aluminium on it. A diamond-tipped wheel dressing tool went through
it as if it was butter. It's kind of amazing to see a grinding wheel
yield so easily to a tiny piece of diamond.

Jeroen Belleman