Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v8k77o$38685$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated,by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 22:12:56 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <v8k77o$38685$1@dont-email.me> References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <bee1046fadd148969411fa9ff78d2f323a05bf26@i2pn2.org> <v8jla0$31dqd$1@dont-email.me> <9d0aec4a510e2dbe0f3ae7f6318a657629f06a3c@i2pn2.org> <v8jmbh$31j2s$1@dont-email.me> <11b8b7e61fe533f27f1437030e79e5abbc2aebf4@i2pn2.org> <Cp-cnbESQeGe_jD7nZ2dnZfqlJ8AAAAA@giganews.com> <15e7f185ebfabb20566b10fbf29acc2bf8ad4ea3@i2pn2.org> <FDKdncj_cLle9jD7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <6051333ddd71c0f0391de1dd1af7885bce6e11ba@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 05:12:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6697133516c971b81fd53169bb6a94ea"; logging-data="3414277"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/SIRewPMY1XfbDa7aKY1y1" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:wXV6tTG/ubFh9E3Km6q9ftU0PuE= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <6051333ddd71c0f0391de1dd1af7885bce6e11ba@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 2482 On 8/2/2024 7:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 8/2/24 7:29 PM, olcott wrote: > > NOPE, I am just a fw steps ahead of you and can see where you are going, > and close the doors in front of you, which is why you get so upset at me. > > The flaws in your logic are so transparent, I can see many of your moves > before you post them. Of course, the fact you keep on repeating them > helps too. *If that was true you would not need to dodge the question* There are zero flaws in my logic that DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction. void DDD() { HHH(DDD); return; } Any attempt by anyone to show flaws would make themselves look ridiculously foolish, as if they flunked out of a CS degree. You don't even have any CS degree, I just checked. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer