Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dogyu <dogyu@riseup.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Thoughts on simplyfortran?
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 03:34:29 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <v8kmi6$3bap3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v85kgi$3vctu$1@dont-email.me> <v89c9h$n0r6$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 09:34:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fb0b7f8e5cbb2d666b434646f9ad2872";
	logging-data="3517219"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2b5iKidCzO91qbL/1PmwX"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IzZCtaF51ZCurksyc9S8WdWDROY=
In-Reply-To: <v89c9h$n0r6$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1897

Many thanks all for your replies and feedback. I generally use vscode 
for coding but I've been tinkering with fortran lately and I was just 
wondering if simpylfortran was a good tool.

Cheers,

dogyu

On 7/29/24 20:31, Lynn McGuire wrote:
> On 7/28/2024 9:27 AM, dogyu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering what are your thoughts on simplyfortran (using linux)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> dogyu
> 
> SimplyFortran is a good product for both Fortran and C++ mixed programs.
> 
> The only problem is that the debugger user interface support is not very 
> sophisticated.  If you want to break on the 4,000th call to a subroutine 
> then you must run dbg directly as the IDE only support breaking on the 
> first call to a subroutine.
> 
> I have asked them to improve this but they have not gotten back to me.
> 
> Lynn
>