| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v8lt59$3iali$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:33:13 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <v8lt59$3iali$2@dont-email.me> References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kou4$3b2ta$1@dont-email.me> <v8lcir$3f6vr$4@dont-email.me> <v8ldcs$3fcgg$2@dont-email.me> <v8lem0$3ftpo$2@dont-email.me> <735401a612caec3eedb531311fd1e09b3d94521d@i2pn2.org> <v8lkdb$3h16a$1@dont-email.me> <5ee8b34a57f12b0630509183ffbd7c07804634b3@i2pn2.org> <v8ll4v$3h8m2$1@dont-email.me> <cbde765b8f9e769930b6c8589556907a41d9c256@i2pn2.org> <v8lm80$3h8m2$3@dont-email.me> <7295d80cad171cd65cc39845362189aa88adca4f@i2pn2.org> <v8lr4u$3iali$1@dont-email.me> <c949dfc8c7354f19a3a3d31325ee9847be91f333@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 20:33:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6697133516c971b81fd53169bb6a94ea"; logging-data="3746482"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dB+JngzSCcBy6PxaqoQWM" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:skF7gdQwEP+RSt1uFyz0k2E23is= In-Reply-To: <c949dfc8c7354f19a3a3d31325ee9847be91f333@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2628 On 8/3/2024 1:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 8/3/24 1:58 PM, olcott wrote: >> Every DDD correctly emulated by any HHH for a finite or >> infinite number of steps never reaches its own "return" >> halt state. >> > > Nope. And you statment is just a incoherent statement, as no partial > simulaitoni for a finite number of steps is "correct". > In other words you are trying to get away with saying that when N instructions are correctly emulated by HHH that none of these correctly emulated instructions were correctly emulated. On top of this you are deceitfully trying to get way with saying that when and infinite number of instructions of DDD are correctly emulated by HHH that this emulated DDD reaches its "return" instruction halt state and halts. Liar Liar swearing your allegiance to the father of lies. I wonder what your pastor would say about this? -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer