Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8lt59$3iali$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
 reach its own return instruction final state?
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:33:13 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v8lt59$3iali$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kou4$3b2ta$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lcir$3f6vr$4@dont-email.me> <v8ldcs$3fcgg$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8lem0$3ftpo$2@dont-email.me>
 <735401a612caec3eedb531311fd1e09b3d94521d@i2pn2.org>
 <v8lkdb$3h16a$1@dont-email.me>
 <5ee8b34a57f12b0630509183ffbd7c07804634b3@i2pn2.org>
 <v8ll4v$3h8m2$1@dont-email.me>
 <cbde765b8f9e769930b6c8589556907a41d9c256@i2pn2.org>
 <v8lm80$3h8m2$3@dont-email.me>
 <7295d80cad171cd65cc39845362189aa88adca4f@i2pn2.org>
 <v8lr4u$3iali$1@dont-email.me>
 <c949dfc8c7354f19a3a3d31325ee9847be91f333@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 20:33:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6697133516c971b81fd53169bb6a94ea";
	logging-data="3746482"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dB+JngzSCcBy6PxaqoQWM"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:skF7gdQwEP+RSt1uFyz0k2E23is=
In-Reply-To: <c949dfc8c7354f19a3a3d31325ee9847be91f333@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2628

On 8/3/2024 1:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/3/24 1:58 PM, olcott wrote:
>> Every DDD correctly emulated by any HHH for a finite or
>> infinite number of steps never reaches its own "return"
>> halt state.
>>
> 
> Nope. And you statment is just a incoherent statement, as no partial 
> simulaitoni for a finite number of steps is "correct".
> 

In other words you are trying to get away with saying that
when N instructions are correctly emulated by HHH that none
of these correctly emulated instructions were correctly emulated.

On top of this you are deceitfully trying to get way
with saying that when and infinite number of instructions
of DDD are correctly emulated by HHH that this emulated
DDD reaches its "return" instruction halt state and halts.

Liar Liar swearing your allegiance to the father of
lies. I wonder what your pastor would say about this?

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer