Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
 reach its own return instruction final state?
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 14:06:17 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <v8lv3a$3j30t$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kou4$3b2ta$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lcir$3f6vr$4@dont-email.me> <v8ldcs$3fcgg$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8lem0$3ftpo$2@dont-email.me>
 <735401a612caec3eedb531311fd1e09b3d94521d@i2pn2.org>
 <v8lkdb$3h16a$1@dont-email.me>
 <5ee8b34a57f12b0630509183ffbd7c07804634b3@i2pn2.org>
 <v8ll4v$3h8m2$1@dont-email.me>
 <cbde765b8f9e769930b6c8589556907a41d9c256@i2pn2.org>
 <v8lm80$3h8m2$3@dont-email.me>
 <7295d80cad171cd65cc39845362189aa88adca4f@i2pn2.org>
 <v8lr4u$3iali$1@dont-email.me>
 <c949dfc8c7354f19a3a3d31325ee9847be91f333@i2pn2.org>
 <v8lt59$3iali$2@dont-email.me>
 <74c4fe66234c5332f4ec6032bc55cc6c5f038aee@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 21:06:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6697133516c971b81fd53169bb6a94ea";
	logging-data="3771421"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GO5/UiKgHNjblLLPMmtTS"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mTXgKlge4qGhFSPXE0Lu752ycc0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <74c4fe66234c5332f4ec6032bc55cc6c5f038aee@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2844

On 8/3/2024 1:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/3/24 2:33 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/3/2024 1:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/3/24 1:58 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> Every DDD correctly emulated by any HHH for a finite or
>>>> infinite number of steps never reaches its own "return"
>>>> halt state.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope. And you statment is just a incoherent statement, as no partial 
>>> simulaitoni for a finite number of steps is "correct".
>>>
>>
>> In other words you are trying to get away with saying that
>> when N instructions are correctly emulated by HHH that none
>> of these correctly emulated instructions were correctly emulated.
> 
> No, I am saying that the result is NOT the final result that the x86 
> semantics says will happen, because the x86 semantics says it does not 
> stop therme
> 

The x86 semantics says that DDD correctly emulated by HHH
never reaches its own halt state of "return" in any finite
or infinite number of steps.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer