Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Ok I made a joke, sorry (e: 2nd Cognitive Turn ~~> no Bayesian
 Brain)
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 23:55:58 +0200
Message-ID: <v8m91e$obh8$1@solani.org>
References: <b406aa35-c39b-46f3-862f-1cc4b75143ae@googlegroups.com>
 <1b7ce2bd-722b-4c2e-b853-12fc2232752bn@googlegroups.com>
 <v6731e$6eft$1@solani.org> <v8e611$k6gf$2@solani.org>
 <v8m566$ofoq$1@solani.org> <v8m7f7$oaq1$2@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 21:55:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="798248"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CzU6cSmZiic5KmoOGAVlGZ5WQGE=
In-Reply-To: <v8m7f7$oaq1$2@solani.org>
X-User-ID: eJwVy9EVwCAIA8CVpBKUcQyR/Udo+33vMMOilgfC0WiSJXJrwUqiXKm8cuwZGQvwrO7jz9/mGPYxjMeG9r39AoiQFl8=
Bytes: 3068
Lines: 60


BTW: Friedrich Ueberweg is quite good
and funny to browse, he reports relatively
unfiltered what we would nowadays call

forms of "rational behaviour", so its a little
pot purry, except for his sections where he
explains some schemas, like the Aristotelan

figures, which are more pure logic of the form.
And peng you get a guy talking pages and
pages about pure and form:

"Pure" logic, ontology, and phenomenology
David Woodruff Smith
https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-philosophie-2003-2-page-21.htm

But the above is a from species of philosophy
that is endangered now. Its predator are
abstractions on the computer like lambda

calculus and the Curry Howard isomorphism. The
revue has become an irrelevant cabarett, only
dead people would be interested in, like

may father, grandfather etc...

Mild Shock schrieb:
> 
> My impression Cognitive Science was never
> Bayesian Brain, so I guess I made a joke.
> 
> The time scale, its start in 1950s and that
> it is still relative unknown subject,
> 
> would explain:
> - why my father or mother never tried to
>    educated me towards cognitive science.
>    It could be that they are totally blank
>    in this respect?
> 
> - why my grandfather or grandmothers never
>    tried to educate me towards cognitive
>    science. Dito It could be that they are totally
>    blank in this respect?
> 
> - it could be that there are rare cases where
>    some philosophers had already a glimps of
>    cognitive science. But when I open for
>    example this booklet:
> 
> System der Logic
> Friedrich Ueberweg
> Bonn - 1868
> https://philpapers.org/rec/UEBSDL
> 
>    One can feel the dry swimming that is reported
>    for several millennia.  What happened in the
>    1950s was the possibility of computer modelling.