| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v8mgs5$3mmj9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 02:09:41 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <v8mgs5$3mmj9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
<P04FAosjolyjDfgV0JPXWx1mF6o@jntp>
<40165884-df8f-4614-8644-9161d72fd1cb@att.net>
<-qUZ96ARwcjh9QPfyWRnijjNwoY@jntp>
<6b837540-3d9a-4b8e-9a70-88d52e81a1a4@att.net>
<xQQT0K_Q_k2FbMcCUXF8j3CEg84@jntp>
<9822f5da-d61e-44ba-9d70-2850da971b42@att.net>
<p36L63dXamDAkHDhkZhDKqx-h-o@jntp>
<d8bbe664-a601-4590-9a7f-d5312b4dae54@att.net> <v8j55c$2u09m$2@dont-email.me>
<w2KNEc6WpgYmvVtoH_VZTRkLnUg@jntp> <v8m8p8$3l66h$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 02:09:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cbf02b69d88504f4dbff69d2f0c6e0ce";
logging-data="3889769"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HaaBJ7MYMmcezaqyG7dnz"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EYXqWMb5nzW/M+8lRsiyaKdIHuU=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v8m8p8$3l66h$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1890
Am 03.08.2024 um 23:51 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> On 8/3/2024 7:25 AM, WM wrote:
>> I recognized lately that you use the wrong definition of NUF.
Mückenheim, Du hirnloser Spinner: Deine Definition von NUF(x) war
bisher: "die Anzahl (Kardinalzahl) aller Stammbrüche, die kleiner-gleich
x sind".
In Zeichen: NUF(x) := card({s e SB : s <= x}) (x e IR)
mit SB := {1/n : n e IN}.
Demenz ist schon ne üble Sache.