Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v8nuft$2idc$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: More Doctor Whoke material removed by BBC this time due to connection with child killer Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 13:08:13 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 62 Message-ID: <v8nuft$2idc$1@dont-email.me> References: <v8lr6n$3hi64$2@dont-email.me> <v8m503$52s$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 15:08:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="15ec62eced7447ed8dd06efd2b61d3f4"; logging-data="84396"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/f1k1BnjpXRS1pj4j8gtYa" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vSF+4kThJHWZhlAFyqJ2BUMJTOE= sha1:0VYxIKnFbCAfO70eGfs0PYcx+gQ= Bytes: 3939 I The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > In article <v8lr6n$3hi64$2@dont-email.me>, > The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote: >> First a child molester and now a child killer have had their >> contributions to Doctor Whoke removed by the BBC because of their >> disgusting and despicable crimes. >> >> https://deadline.com/2024/08/uk-stabbings-suspect-previously-appeared-doctor-who-charity-advert-now-removed-by-bbc-1236030784/ >> >> When will the sick woke perverts, retards, degenerates, and child >> groomers running the show be removed? Anyone with any sense would >> realize that you don't promote sexual agendas to children or to anyone. >> >> Instead of protecting children and families BBC give respectability to >> perverts and killers through their disgusting DEI initiatives. >> > > Nothing equitable about this. That’s right. Totally inequitable. Aggie is being an ignorant stupid arsehole using his agenda driven prejudices to accuse people of something they didn’t do. Who can possibly vet and exclude an 11 year old from a charity campaign because six years later he will prove to be severely mentally unstable and perform an atrocity on little girls? How are they supposed to know? Children in Need didn’t choose an 11 year old Welsh boy who wanted to dress as the Doctor, because of any diversity and inclusion agenda. They probably did it because he was a photogenic kid. It’s right to remove his footage from the archives - he’s definitely lost the right to have positive images of him on-screen. But neither the BBC, nor Children in Need, nor Moffat’s Doctor Who production team did anything wrong at the time and to try to draw spurious connections like this is insulting to people of even modest intelligence. No one with even a smidgen of common sense would even think it. Even a fascistic, misogynistic moron shouldn’t ought to either, to be honest, but clearly I’m giving Aggie too much credit there. Similarly, the BBC didn’t hire Huw Edwards because of any diversity or inclusion agenda, and not because they knew him to be a paedophile - they didn’t. And RTD didn’t invite him to cameo on Doctor Who for those reasons either. No one at the time would have known about Edwards’ secret proclivities. So they can’t be blamed for that or for using a respected news anchor in a cameo. The BBC’s behaviour over the last nine months has been questionable for sure and they have questions to answer on that. But that has nothing to do with the rightfully-to-be-re-edited “Fear Her” footage. Edwards will no longer be a part of the heritage of Doctor Who, and quite right too. Same as the execrable “A Fix With Sontarans”. Dustbin of history and good riddance. -- “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor