Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v8nums$1n09$6@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8nums$1n09$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by
 HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 08:11:56 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v8nums$1n09$6@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kp6s$3c5h2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8ld1f$3f6vr$5@dont-email.me> <v8ldl0$3ennf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lfb9$3g2jl$1@dont-email.me> <v8lgsr$3gadt$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8lhrr$3gkbk$1@dont-email.me> <v8n6un$3tv08$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 15:11:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="903796c801119a1f2fd86200a8e93bf1";
	logging-data="56329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+nWJcH6+cMZs9JTDdu0jIs"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iSpswee4/9MHcNN/F2PTHn8PgzE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v8n6un$3tv08$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2154

On 8/4/2024 1:26 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 03.aug.2024 om 17:20 schreef olcott:>>
>> When you try to show how DDD simulated by HHH does
>> reach its "return" instruction you must necessarily
>> must fail unless you cheat by disagreeing with the
>> semantics of C. That you fail to have a sufficient
>> understanding of the semantics of C is less than no
>> rebuttal what-so-ever.
> 
> Fortunately that is not what I try, because I understand that HHH cannot 
> possibly simulate itself correctly.
> 

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

In other words when HHH simulates itself simulating DDD it
is supposed to do something other than simulating itself
simulating DDD ???  Do you expect it to make a cup of coffee?

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer