| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v8oj1n$6kik$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <abc@def.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own return instruction final state?
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 13:59:03 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <v8oj1n$6kik$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kou4$3b2ta$1@dont-email.me>
<v8lcir$3f6vr$4@dont-email.me> <v8ldcs$3fcgg$2@dont-email.me>
<v8lem0$3ftpo$2@dont-email.me>
<735401a612caec3eedb531311fd1e09b3d94521d@i2pn2.org>
<v8lkdb$3h16a$1@dont-email.me>
<5ee8b34a57f12b0630509183ffbd7c07804634b3@i2pn2.org>
<v8ll4v$3h8m2$1@dont-email.me>
<cbde765b8f9e769930b6c8589556907a41d9c256@i2pn2.org>
<v8lm80$3h8m2$3@dont-email.me> <v8n6mq$3tv07$3@dont-email.me>
<v8o14v$30uf$1@dont-email.me>
<950d4eed7965040e841a970d48d5b6f417ff43dc@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 20:59:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="903796c801119a1f2fd86200a8e93bf1";
logging-data="217684"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19NtvaZhDv8hVhM14BcIAIg"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nTXfFtZvJb6VVGOu1WsDnXuA3Ag=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <950d4eed7965040e841a970d48d5b6f417ff43dc@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2774
On 8/4/2024 1:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/4/24 9:53 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/4/2024 1:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 03.aug.2024 om 18:35 schreef olcott:
>> >>>> ∞ instructions of DDD correctly emulated by HHH[∞] never
>>>> reach their own "return" instruction final state.
>>>>
>>>> So you are saying that the infinite one does?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Dreaming again of HHH that does not abort? Dreams are no substitute
>>> for facts.
>>> The HHH that aborts and halts, halts. A tautology.
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>> HHH(DDD);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> That is the right answer to the wrong question.
>> I am asking whether or not DDD emulated by HHH
>> reaches its "return" instruction.
>
> But the "DDD emulated by HHH" is the program DDD above,
When I say DDD emulated by HHH I mean at any level of
emulation and not and direct execution.
DDD emulated by HHH a googleplex levels deep is included
in DDD emulated by HHH.
Yo keep screwing around trying to twist the meaning of the
actual words that I say.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer