Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v8p43d$9dec$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: iPhone revenue fell for a second consecutive quarter (perhaps due to Apple's failed R&D efforts) Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:50:04 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 89 Message-ID: <v8p43d$9dec$6@dont-email.me> References: <v8hnso$148k$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <xn0op39w7pkxotf00b@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v8j88k$2bte$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <xn0op3bkdpn7jxs00d@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v8jchs$27n4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v8jeog$mtgi$1@solani.org> <v8okgh$6v5h$1@dont-email.me> <v8ossj$pvg0$1@solani.org> <v8p1ng$9dec$4@dont-email.me> <v8p3sr$q2a2$1@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 01:50:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b5244ff5a70322e25e255d0d7dc483c"; logging-data="308684"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HjJ0sSKtttRJyz6JhNn3pjzZ40HPPM9Q=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:xEwmMYhHTyKZY7jOs0n6OP3T/ts= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <v8p3sr$q2a2$1@solani.org> Bytes: 5234 On 2024-08-04 16:46, badgolferman wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> On 2024-08-04 14:46, badgolferman wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> On 2024-08-02 13:15, badgolferman wrote: >>>>> Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote: >>>>>> badgolferman wrote on Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:50:28 -0000 (UTC) : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe it is and maybe it has to do with the people being employed to >>>>>>> develop these things. Are they the best and brightest developers >>>>>>> available, considering Apple has the money to pay them? Or are they >>>>>>> DEI candidates selected to make Apple look good to shareholders and >>>>>>> those who demand such things? >>>>>> >>>>>> All I can say is I am always reasonable in all my factual assessments. >>>>>> As you know, zealots never know ANYTHING about what Apple actually does. >>>>>> >>>>>> At least you read about Apple outside of Apple's (brilliant) Marketing ads. >>>>>> >>>>>> To your concerns, all I can tell you is what is in the news about Apple's >>>>>> strategic decisions, which I'm sure you can handle - but the zealots can't. >>>>>> >>>>>> This, from midyear 2024 says, for example the iPhone accounts for "55% >>>>>> ($115.7 billion) of Apple's $210.3 billion in net sales", so it behooves us >>>>>> to concentrate on what Apple has improved on technology for that iPhone. >>>>>> <https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/05/07/apple-spent-183-billion-rd-in-12-years-674-billion/> >>>>>> >>>>>> Notice the fact that Apple spends far more on propping up stock than on R&D >>>>>> (where the article uses the word "breathtaking" where the article says no >>>>>> other company comes close to what Apple spends, not in R&D, but on P:E. >>>>>> >>>>>> What's a possible assessment takeaway from those two facts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe: >>>>>> a. Apple cares more than anyone about artificially propping up stock... >>>>>> b. And, yet, Apple cares far less than most in terms of actual R&D. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do YOU make of those two breathtakingly different facts about Apple? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It says Apple is on track to spend $31 billion this year on R&D,. >>>>> underscoring its record of increases every year since 2013. That’s >>>>> certainly no number to sneeze at, but unfortunately there hasn’t been much >>>>> innovation to show for it over the last 5-6 years. I know some will say the >>>>> mobile phone has reached its peak in features, but they’ve been saying that >>>>> for a long time. A truly innovative company would create things customers >>>>> didn’t know they wanted, not new colors or emojis. >>>> >>>> Give some recent examples of what you would term "things customers >>>> didn’t know they wanted"... >>>> >>>> ...from any smartphone manufacturer. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Face ID, >> >> Not recent. The first phone with it came out in 2011, and when Apple >> developed it enough to use it, it was 2017 >> >>> contactless payments, >> >> First used in a phone in 2004 (by Sony), but not actually useful until >> Apple got it right. >> >>> QR code scanning, >> >> Seriously? >> >> So the newest thing you can point to is from more than a decade ago. >> >> and other useful things >>> like these. New colors and new emojis don’t count. >> >> So it's not like Apple is somehow unique in not rolling out the >> innovations, is it? >> >> > > Admittedly I am not an early adopter of technology and tend to wait for > stuff to become mature. I gave you examples of useful things. At the time > they were not considered important but they have become so over time. These > are the type of things smart phone manufacturers should be developing. > But your argument was that Apple wasn't doing much lately. Implying that others were.