Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8rfli$131u5$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: iPhone revenue fell for a second consecutive quarter (perhaps due
 to Apple's failed R&D efforts)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 14:19:45 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v8rfli$131u5$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v8hnso$148k$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <xn0op39w7pkxotf00b@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v8j88k$2bte$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <xn0op3bkdpn7jxs00d@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v8jchs$27n4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v8jeog$mtgi$1@solani.org>
 <v8okgh$6v5h$1@dont-email.me> <v8ossj$pvg0$1@solani.org>
 <v8p1ng$9dec$4@dont-email.me> <v8p3sr$q2a2$1@solani.org>
 <v8p43d$9dec$6@dont-email.me> <v8p53i$q2nt$1@solani.org>
 <v8q8e5$qja9$1@solani.org> <v8qu5m$jbt4$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0op7n3eu2mvvt000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 23:19:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b5244ff5a70322e25e255d0d7dc483c";
	logging-data="1148869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183VGwLBs5MT8TRiWuFVL1OpNvad+7V+S0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:40McsbSuYbxyartSWcsWCsS35p4=
In-Reply-To: <xn0op7n3eu2mvvt000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 2848

On 2024-08-05 14:13, badgolferman wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-08-05 03:10, badgolferman wrote:
>>> badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But your argument was that Apple wasn't doing much lately.
>>>>>
>>>>> Implying that others were.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You inferred incorrectly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, you did.
>>>
>>> The topic was about Apple. Other smartphone companies were not
>>> mentioned by me.
>>>
>>
>> But implicit any discussion of whether someone (person or company) is
>> doing enough of something is that it must be in relation to some
>> standard.
>>
>> I can drive very fast in my Formula F Honda open wheel race car...
>>
>> ...but it's only very fast if I compare it against other Formula F
>> cars at the same track.
> 
> 
> No.  It's not anything innovative if it's not better than previous
> versions of itself.

But your argument was about the PACE of innovation.

Is Apple's pace of innovation noticeably worse than any other smartphone 
manufacturer's?

Seriously, I had thought you smarter than this.