Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v8rqdk-7us31.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8rqdk-7us31.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: A Problem To Solve :-)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 07:00:33 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <v8rqdk-7us31.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <uog01l$mi9n$1@solani.org>   <uqj214$4n5g$1@solani.org> <uqscuu$9b97$1@solani.org> <ur45p8$db29$1@solani.org> <urlmqs$mk3p$1@solani.org> <uru46k$r281$1@solani.org> <us803n$vq9u$1@solani.org> <usdil4$12kro$1@solani.org> <usl7l5$16vel$1@solani.org> <ut5b51$1eobe$1@solani.org> <ut615g$1feb3$1@solani.org> <utl6fv$1moef$1@solani.org> <uu20sv$1t6i2$1@solani.org> <uu4sv8$1umj5$1@solani.org> <uucvp2$23320$1@solani.org> <peepdk-54b31.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <uud9a7$23l4a$1@solani.org>
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 14:01:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1c97c2c9bbcc5401121b94af724d0bb5";
	logging-data="2662689"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DanAplPl7IHMIZzFMRwcN"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-101-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9yiohAiB/t1itIwY7CLYmTzOpGU=
Bytes: 3541

In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/31/24 20:15, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> <snip old crap and random babble>
>> 
>>> If the missile computes that 5 fighter jets at time t will exactly be at
>>> these coordinates in the sky:
>>>
>>> Jet 1: (4.38 km, 3.9 km, 8.1 km)
>>> Jet 2: (5.23 km, 9.61 km, 4.74 km)
>>> Jet 3: (6.93 km, 6.01 km, 6.88 km)
>>> Jet 4: (8.32 km, 2.12 km, 2.5 km)
>>> Jet 5: (2.53 km, 4.23 km, 5.82 km)
>>>
>>> then answer the following 2 questions:
>>>
>>> 1- what would be the coordinates of the point in the sky, that the
>>> missile with the weakest warhead needs to explode at, at time t, to
>>> damage all those 5 fighter jets critically enough?
>> 
>> It depends on the velocity, which in physics has both a direction and
>> magnitude, of the jets.
>> 
>>>
>>> 2- within what minimum radius of that explosion, any fighter jet would
>>> get critically damaged at time t?
>>>
>> 
>> And again, it depends on the velocity, which in physics has both a
>> direction and magnitude, of the jets.
>> 
>> Jets have long been able to outrun an explosion, even nuclear given
>> enough lead, that is behind them.
>> 
>> You also need to know the characteristics of the warhead, which is
>> measured in overpressure versus distance from detonation.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Not that you've got any intention to solve the problem (I don't think 
> you can solve it) and you just want to be a dick as usual, still, I add 
> for others who may be interested, that the point you're making is the 
> business of missile's own software, and not this problem. Missile itself 
> computes the point at which it can get just early enough and explode so 
> the damaging effects would reach all five targets by the time t and at 
> those five locations that the targets are, as given above.

As someone that has actually spent several years dealing with
anti-aircaft missiles all I can say is that you haven't a clue how
either the intercept equations or warheads work.

This is just your usual Dunning-Kruger babbling nonsense.

<snip remaining babbling twaddle>