Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v8vale$29sva$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by
 HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:18:52 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <v8vale$29sva$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kp6s$3c5h2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8ld1f$3f6vr$5@dont-email.me> <v8ldl0$3ennf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lfb9$3g2jl$1@dont-email.me> <v8lgsr$3gadt$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8lhrr$3gkbk$1@dont-email.me> <v8n6un$3tv08$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8nums$1n09$6@dont-email.me>
 <a7d98f536ed0dfcab52215e73ff85556026f3f0a@i2pn2.org>
 <v8oj55$6kik$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 10:18:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d87107b678b3faaac4c3fbbb161088e1";
	logging-data="2421738"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+i7zb6iqtwVd5WFD0jwdvg"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SXCFqdBW+TRRDVilZXqrEHYIEJI=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v8oj55$6kik$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2797

Op 04.aug.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott:
> On 8/4/2024 1:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 8/4/24 9:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 8/4/2024 1:26 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 03.aug.2024 om 17:20 schreef olcott:>>
>>>>> When you try to show how DDD simulated by HHH does
>>>>> reach its "return" instruction you must necessarily
>>>>> must fail unless you cheat by disagreeing with the
>>>>> semantics of C. That you fail to have a sufficient
>>>>> understanding of the semantics of C is less than no
>>>>> rebuttal what-so-ever.
>>>>
>>>> Fortunately that is not what I try, because I understand that HHH 
>>>> cannot possibly simulate itself correctly.
>>>>
>>>
>>> void DDD()
>>> {
>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>    return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> In other words when HHH simulates itself simulating DDD it
>>> is supposed to do something other than simulating itself
>>> simulating DDD ???  Do you expect it to make a cup of coffee?
>>>
>>
>> No, but to be correct it need to complete that to the end.
>>
> 
> Saying this and knowing there is no end cannot possibly
> be construed as anything but intentional deception.
> 
And what is saying that there is no end for a program that aborts and 
halts after two cycles? Are you dreaming again of the non-aborting HHH 
that does not halt? Dreams are no substitute for facts.