Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The physics of [SR] still inconsistent
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:04:14 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <v8vrce$2nkf1$6@dont-email.me>
References: <17e96d0b4264a738$191733$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v8vll1$2nkf1$1@dont-email.me>
 <17e9717a93af7a45$186571$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v8vpc6$2nkf1$3@dont-email.me>
 <17e972838ce25409$204752$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v8vqjv$2nkf1$4@dont-email.me>
 <17e973bdf9b271e2$205092$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:04:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ee868451ad7ede8480e4387e31bc418";
	logging-data="2871777"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+F6oHzTSmKl5KlYksQgdf0"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CH0w/BtRSsgpaGtf2eMzkkni4D4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17e973bdf9b271e2$205092$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2459

Le 07/08/2024 à 14:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:51, Python pisze:
>> Le 07/08/2024 à 14:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 07.08.2024 o 14:29, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 07/08/2024 à 14:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>> [stupid babbling]
>>>
>>>>> Similarly (thanks for correction) 
>>>>
>>>> You're welcome.
>>>>
>>>>> [profanity]
>>>>
>>>
>>> And the physics of [SR] remains
>>> not even consistent; a [snip profanity]
>>> [snip profanity] gedanken copies  of Solar
>>> System  (sic) is not changing  anything.
>>
>> It is. 
> 
> No, it is not. Physicists of 1905 were
> VERY stupid, sure, but not stupid enough
> to invoke gedanken copies of Earth in their
> definition of a physical measurement unit.
> Their definitions of second and meter were
> what they were was and The Shit of your
> idiot guru was not even consistent.
> 
> 
> And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
> would be, and he has written it clearly
> enough for anyone able to read (even if not
> clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
> 

Yawn.