Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <abc@def.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last
 remaining sticking point
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:21:15 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v8vscb$32fso$9@dont-email.me>
References: <v8tcqm$1l0av$1@dont-email.me> <v8vaq5$29sva$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:21:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6826d85dca534e829aa60949a8b0d61";
	logging-data="3227544"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Cu1N8aLnrmS55KmCD0lud"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FvX5Xkglz3+soQsKcFXGkR7/9kY=
In-Reply-To: <v8vaq5$29sva$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1900

On 8/7/2024 3:21 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 06.aug.2024 om 16:43 schreef olcott:
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>> }
>>
>> Understanding that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot
>> possibly reach its own "return" instruction is a mandatory
>> prerequisite to further discussion.
> A correct understanding that HHH cannot possibly simulate itself 
> correctly is therefore enough to stop the discussion.

That you insist and disagreeing with the semantics of the x86
language seems that you really want to avoid any honest dialogue
and only want to play head games.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer