Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:57:52 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <v8vuh0$2nkf1$18@dont-email.me>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com>
 <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me>
 <RtvMbeFJR6wD1Xodq4NSLvRFV0o@jntp> <v8vtg1$2nkf1$13@dont-email.me>
 <17e976bbf22e4bdd$168833$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:57:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ee868451ad7ede8480e4387e31bc418";
	logging-data="2871777"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/m9niymD/LLv8Weus+WZzz"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vKIVXTfVff1kRmMUPBuuQBVwjFw=
In-Reply-To: <17e976bbf22e4bdd$168833$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2304

Le 07/08/2024 à 15:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 07.08.2024 o 15:40, Python pisze:
>> Le 07/08/2024 à 15:37, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>> Le 07/08/2024 à 15:19, Python a écrit :
>>>> There is nothing in common between your demented ill-defined
>>>> contradictory "ideas" and Poincaré's work. NOTHING.
>>>
>>> Les plaisanteries les plus courtes sont les meilleures.
>>
>> It is a fact. Anyone can check that you are lying by reading Poincaré's
>> word. PERIOD.
> 
> Samely as it is with your impudent lies  of
> P supporting [Einstein] about rejecting
> basic [Euclidean] math.
> 

Math is far out of your expertise, to say the least, Wozniak.

Using Riemannian geometry is *not* "rejecting" anything. Same way
as using complex numbers is not "rejecting" real analysis. Etc.

In order to read *and* understand what it is about one need a
minimum level of knowledge of the field (that you do not have)
and a minimum intellectual integrity (that you do not have either).