Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Does Lobachevsky's V axiom deny Euclid's V axiom
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 12:05:50 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <v9259v$3srn5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <17e9a9478a391c46$205292$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 12:05:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18c28e46923fb2fd5afbc74c1fd3d9c6";
	logging-data="4091621"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HiH+bxLtXnKNQ7Z3LxIiR"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DX9BHCu/v6ianZIaRih6+5JXDng=
In-Reply-To: <17e9a9478a391c46$205292$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1568

Le 08/08/2024 à 07:20, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> 
> Well, they're practically  negation of each other.
> And you won't find a rule "not p is not necessarily
> denying p" in mathematics - but it is an usual component
> of pseudophilosophies concocted by morons for excusing
> both their inconsistencies and plain lies.
> 
> So - the question is as in the topic. What do you think?

https://www.cartoonstock.com/cartoon?searchID=CS198505

"Just a darn minute — Yesterday you said that X equals two!"