Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9287a$3u0v3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research
Subject: Re: Inertia and third principle
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 21:15:56 PDT
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Approved: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]" <dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com (sci.physics.research)
Message-ID: <v9287a$3u0v3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v5357b$31hot$1@dont-email.me>
  <v5bk0b$taot$1@dont-email.me>
  <v5onk7$3skou$1@dont-email.me>
  <v62st1$234qv$1@dont-email.me>
  <v6j6ll$1c2i9$1@dont-email.me>
  <v72fvt$jcct$1@dont-email.me>
  <v7immp$1uej$1@dont-email.me>
  <v87fm1$ct7f$1@dont-email.me>
  <v8ki29$3a7sa$1@dont-email.me>
  <v8nask$3uqln$1@dont-email.me>
  <v8podn$h48j$1@dont-email.me>
  <v90lgs$3bfo1$1@dont-email.me>
  <v920hu$3rsb8$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com
X-Trace: individual.net 87LQvYOwaCrHIeTpdxPlkQd5+WAIvb9mwJ4tNXMGkNTKhNvI5umLttMI3a
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+/lt13eavjeNbU4VMSFOa91b2rA= sha256:6LjrNbcXr/c7xnxxKmbzXG1SlhG8JKc8hMDfiPjFCy8=
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUdlPf/nP7T6u/Fuouuk0G3xWMxjUPBJ7AX/iw2vrNgZIj6XxwjHTMXZT2atC9OsmyTE7DpX4SneEehOCkawfkOXUXSuhGOFj8X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19Frw0tEscv+GeQ0DbrHSQnAaj/e+FD7NCwFtgMc+hXh4sYR7nh822J
X-ICQ: 1931503972
Bytes: 2184

Mikko il 08/08/2024 10:56:30 ha scritto:
>> But how much of that +11.25 is action force exerted by A against B and how 
>> much of that -11.25 is reaction force exerted by B against A?
>
> The two forces are equal. 

Obviously: 11.25 is equal to 11.25!

You didn't realize that my question is about something else.

>> Certainly, the force +11.25 on body B is exerted entirely by body A.
>> 
>> However, not all of the -11.25 force on body A is exerted by body B.
>
> Yes, it is. 

And yet it isn't.

Follow my reasoning to the end (I haven't completed it yet) and you 
will find out why it isn't.

> You can prove that from the third law...

Maybe you haven't noticed but it's the third law I'm contesting.

Luigi Fortunati