Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 13:17:51 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com>
 <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me>
 <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 13:17:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18c28e46923fb2fd5afbc74c1fd3d9c6";
	logging-data="4091621"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JHHHHwQJBWGT3SFzkeYN9"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QGmwMKAXC48NEzQBsj1IharhR9Y=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net>
Bytes: 2203

Le 08/08/2024 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit :
....
> Actually Poincare did and assumed a four dimensional 'curved' spacetime, 
> from which Euclid's three-dimensional space is a 'sub-chapter'.

This is not true.

> This euclidean space is kind of projection into the realm of the local 
> observer, who 'cuts' spacetime into time and space, simply by being 
> somewhere.

This is not true.

> This is a very different concept than the usual mainstream 
> interpretation and actually different to the interpretation of Einstein 
> in his 1905 paper, too.

This is not true.

> Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski.

This is true.

> So Poincare's relativity is different to Einstein's, which was mainly 
> based on Hendrik Lorentz and his 'Lorentz transform'.

This is not true.

> But Poincare regarded this concept of Lorentz as wrong

This is not true.

> (even if he invented the name 'Lorentz transform').

This is true.