Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 13:41:54 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <v92au2$3srn5$6@dont-email.me>
References: <GBEGTHyJnMpjHuJ0IoZO0OLSc1M@jntp>
 <0b2ff7832787b9d3165d93803b09df8f@www.novabbs.com>
 <74ipUL6JcQu72w-mbGQ7BbVp7kU@jntp>
 <cda33e42de10aeee9283e500b47a63f9@www.novabbs.com>
 <AE2L2lzGJn13Z_4dg3bpJC59QsA@jntp>
 <54caf376a18495506c6cdaddac8bbb07@www.novabbs.com>
 <e9VbCZrKIQA_P3jVi8iCsIHcOyg@jntp> <v928sa$3srn5$4@dont-email.me>
 <75AkS1AFliMvWLCXIIIFM_33xpM@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 13:41:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18c28e46923fb2fd5afbc74c1fd3d9c6";
	logging-data="4091621"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lwSyHNTyR2ZzkOhbK7tnL"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IbPdbSnZnHD4DkLTnjQ03xUPFx0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <75AkS1AFliMvWLCXIIIFM_33xpM@jntp>
Bytes: 2975

Le 08/08/2024 à 13:20, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> Le 08/08/2024 à 13:06, Python a écrit :
> 
>> Moreover you are lying: people are not objecting to your fantasies
>> by only saying that it is not what SR says (which is nevertheless
>> a perfectly valid objection) but by pointing out fallacies and
>> contradictions in your own words.
> 
> You lies, Jean-Pierre Messager, you lies.
> 
> "Mais tu sais que tu mens".
> 
> You are the one who is lying by claiming that people criticize what I 
> say because it is fantasy.
> Not at all, it is generally enough to read a little of an author to know 
> or sense whether it is fantasy or not.
> No, no, no, that is not it at all: if people criticize, it is because it 
> does not go in the direction of their convictions or their teachings, 
> period.

You are highly delusional Richard. It takes only about half a page to
prove that your claims about accelerated frames of reference are:
- logically unsound (invoking tautologies as conditions, claiming
   that a frame dependent property implies a frame independent one)
- contradicting previous claims you had on the twin paradox
- contradicting the principle of Relativity

Nothing there is invoking SR in any ways. Your lie is exposed,
again.

You have a psychotic mental bloc (in addition to be a complete
idiot) that prevent you to even consider that something you pull
out of you a** with no justification at all can be wrong.

This is called "arrognorance". On top of that you have no intellectual
integrity and you are a pathological liar. Just like your buddy Donald
J. Trump.