Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:25:24 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <v92o14$3srn5$36@dont-email.me>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com>
 <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me>
 <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net> <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me>
 <QV9CDTycOcQmvSfs_5DMN5TUrWY@jntp> <QKHiJS4WFXlVEpl_szZx_gwP9YE@jntp>
 <17e9c96c37b23ec8$138557$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v92n90$3srn5$35@dont-email.me>
 <17e9ca2b1a2655d7$230019$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 17:25:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18c28e46923fb2fd5afbc74c1fd3d9c6";
	logging-data="4091621"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eKZyl7erpYYQT3ULR1l+w"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TUBwZPIz24nfFDskZiaMJOfHHxw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17e9ca2b1a2655d7$230019$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3252

Le 08/08/2024 à 17:23, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 08.08.2024 o 17:12, Python pisze:
>> Le 08/08/2024 à 17:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 08.08.2024 o 16:56, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 08/08/2024 à 16:52,  Richard Hachel   a écrit :
>>>>> Le 08/08/2024 à 13:17, Python a écrit :
>>>>>> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is true.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it's true.
>>>>
>>>> "no" then "it's true"?
>>>>
>>>>> When Henri Poincaré (blessed be he and honored be his holy memory 
>>>>> before the divine Word) wrote his transformations, he gave one of 
>>>>> the most beautiful mathematical poems in the universe.
>>>>> These transformations that Lorentz searched for years without ever 
>>>>> finding them are admirable.
>>>>> Now, we must interpret this PHYSICALLY.
>>>>> It is not by jumping like a kid like Python, shouting: "Poincaré is 
>>>>> beautiful, Poincaré is brilliant, Poincaré was a God in 
>>>>> mathematics" that we will get there.
>>>>
>>>> As if you had the mathematical competence to understand Poincaré! You 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
>>> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
>>> would be, and he has written it clearly
>>> enough for anyone able to read (even if not
>>> clearly enough for you, 
>>
>> :-D :-D :-D :-P
>>
>>> It's you who has no competence to understand
>>> P. You've demonstrated it very well.
>>
>> Sure. Fancy to teach math in my seat in a few schools in France?
> 
> Tried some times - hopeless.

You tried to teach? And failed? Surprising. What happened?

>  porr stinker

You got your signature wrong. It is "poor" not "porr".