Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never
 reaches its halt state ---
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 22:03:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <v940uh$hqmp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kp6s$3c5h2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8ld1f$3f6vr$5@dont-email.me> <v8ldl0$3ennf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lfb9$3g2jl$1@dont-email.me> <v8lgsr$3gadt$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8lhrr$3gkbk$1@dont-email.me> <v8n6un$3tv08$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8nums$1n09$6@dont-email.me> <v8vah7$29sva$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8vr7e$32fso$2@dont-email.me> <v91vc4$3qp1r$2@dont-email.me>
 <v92ge1$p1$2@dont-email.me>
 <f37108f5c9868fc309f42ef78982e2c865ad544c@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 05:03:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bb86fb6b7518b299c8da34bf84593b17";
	logging-data="584409"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18zeeoICzN7apPh+qxOb4yd"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/PNeITyzARLDcqIh64i+gKhm2L4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <f37108f5c9868fc309f42ef78982e2c865ad544c@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3143

On 8/8/2024 9:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/8/24 9:15 AM, olcott wrote:
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> Each HHH of every HHH that can possibly exist definitely
>> *emulates zero to infinity instructions correctly* In
>> none of these cases does the emulated DDD ever reach
>> its "return" instruction halt state.
>>
>> *There are no double-talk weasel words around this*
>> *There are no double-talk weasel words around this*
>> *There are no double-talk weasel words around this*
>>
>> There is no need to show any execution trace at the x86 level
>> every expert in the C language sees that the emulated DDD
>> cannot possibly reaches its "return" instruction halt state.
>>
>> Every rebuttal that anyone can possibly make is necessarily
>> erroneous because the first paragraph is a tautology.
>>
>>
> 
> Nope, it is a lie based on comfusing the behavior of DDD which is what 
> "Halting" is.
> 

Finally something besides
the strawman deception,
disagreeing with a tautology, or
pure ad hominem.

You must first agree with everything that I said above
before we can get to this last and final point that it
not actually directly referenced above.

*Two key facts*
(a) The "return" instruction is the halt state of DDD.
(b) DDD correctly emulated by any HHH never reaches this state.

Until you agree to these two points I will continue to
point out that you are trying to disagree with a tautology.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer