| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v94564$iptn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: What if The Doctor reviewed ChatGPT instead? Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:16:04 +0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 4 Message-ID: <v94564$iptn$1@dont-email.me> References: <v92oje$3ptpl$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 06:16:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ae5c0280418a9e480da6d6a18d22ea49"; logging-data="616375"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18wROO2z2hh+nMQsyxy834AijSyS5Rst34=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:EGXOuvq8yfnVC4ue45bzUWfQeZY= In-Reply-To: <v92oje$3ptpl$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 1174 Kestral Gaian wrote: > "It's a bit rubbish, isn't it? Almost makes you think it's intelligent." What if WOTAN reviewed ChatGPT?