Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v94lk9$l3ht$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:56:41 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 52 Message-ID: <v94lk9$l3ht$3@dont-email.me> References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com> <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me> <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net> <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me> <lhlo3pF8p0oU4@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eb292ca6c24ce240e8f47e0460d20c0a"; logging-data="691773"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19E1r0Qp8VsBxpMqLgTVAHh" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:rtJlnzGRVubRrA2qblwgWAQ1+e8= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <lhlo3pF8p0oU4@mid.individual.net> Bytes: 2681 Le 09/08/2024 à 07:35, Thomas Heger a écrit : > Am Donnerstag000008, 08.08.2024 um 13:17 schrieb Python: >> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> ... >>> Actually Poincare did and assumed a four dimensional 'curved' >>> spacetime, from which Euclid's three-dimensional space is a >>> 'sub-chapter'. >> >> This is not true. >> >>> This euclidean space is kind of projection into the realm of the >>> local observer, who 'cuts' spacetime into time and space, simply by >>> being somewhere. >> >> This is not true. >> >>> This is a very different concept than the usual mainstream >>> interpretation and actually different to the interpretation of >>> Einstein in his 1905 paper, too. >> >> This is not true. >> >>> Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski. >> >> This is true. >> >>> So Poincare's relativity is different to Einstein's, which was mainly >>> based on Hendrik Lorentz and his 'Lorentz transform'. >> >> This is not true. >> >>> But Poincare regarded this concept of Lorentz as wrong >> >> This is not true. >> >>> (even if he invented the name 'Lorentz transform'). >> >> This is true. >> > > Would mind telling a little about your reasons to think so? > > You just say: > > this is true and that ain't. > > But why do you think so? Because I've actually read Poincaré, Einstein, et al.