Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v96k5b$dggm$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 21:43:55 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 71 Message-ID: <v96k5b$dggm$1@dont-email.me> References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8lhrr$3gkbk$1@dont-email.me> <v8n6un$3tv08$1@dont-email.me> <v8nums$1n09$6@dont-email.me> <v8vah7$29sva$1@dont-email.me> <v8vr7e$32fso$2@dont-email.me> <v91vc4$3qp1r$2@dont-email.me> <v92ge1$p1$2@dont-email.me> <f37108f5c9868fc309f42ef78982e2c865ad544c@i2pn2.org> <v940uh$hqmp$1@dont-email.me> <ca6cbe14b2f6d8e912084e2db0d86078e5c113d4@i2pn2.org> <v943ir$ii13$1@dont-email.me> <a54ea3444e46e8cdd80311a3f7dab8a11c717833@i2pn2.org> <v9455t$im42$1@dont-email.me> <3ac18da75f5f8e4bcaf17800919bb5dc2658d33c@i2pn2.org> <v955rd$o1gt$1@dont-email.me> <adc1aa9dbcaab1112f613fb262b17b64a11619a1@i2pn2.org> <v96dji$8lqu$1@dont-email.me> <352096a93343dd1c5614d27c5e300864b48e2698@i2pn2.org> <v96fhf$90t7$1@dont-email.me> <6b16c88705f6c0b6a82a454f8d18c5ea9d665a02@i2pn2.org> <v96h4j$d1aa$1@dont-email.me> <ef112180e1a888b65fba51c8aa921a3858001d01@i2pn2.org> <v96j0b$d94c$1@dont-email.me> <c7ee6bc3691887c493aa9a00c49610fa46bc8fab@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 04:43:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec0d1ee71ceed677a7540299f25b1a73"; logging-data="442902"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191h37utgEyCaOwF4s+U7Qf" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:c8S2ZTb8hamYOgQ4J7TVX+TqFS8= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <c7ee6bc3691887c493aa9a00c49610fa46bc8fab@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 4589 On 8/9/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 8/9/24 10:24 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 8/9/2024 8:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 8/9/24 9:52 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 8/9/2024 8:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 8/9/24 9:25 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 8/9/2024 8:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/9/24 8:52 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When we look at every HHH that can possibly exist then >>>>>>>> we see that DDD correctly emulated by each one of these >>>>>>>> cannot possibly reach its "return" instruction halt state. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But ONLY ONE of those actuallu "correctly emulates" the input, >>>>>>> and that one isn't a decider. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In other words you are trying to keep getting away >>>>>> with the bald-faced lie that when HHH correctly >>>>>> emulates N instructions of DDD (where N > 0) that >>>>>> it did not correctly emulate any instructions of DDD. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Give it up you lost you are stuck in repeat mode* >>>>>> *Give it up you lost you are stuck in repeat mode* >>>>>> *Give it up you lost you are stuck in repeat mode* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, I guess you don't understand English. >>>>> >>>>> Where did I say that simulating N instructions correctly is not >>>>> simulating ANY instructions correctly. >>>>> >>>> >>>> *Shown above* >>>> "But ONLY ONE of those actuallu "correctly emulates" the input..." >>>> >>> >>> Right, becuase to correctly emulate, you need to correct emulate >>> EVERY instruction, not just some of them. >>> >> >> So you defining whole notion simulating termination analyzers >> as incorrect even though professor Sipser has agreed that the >> simulation need not be complete. > > No, they just need to do the job right. > > But it needs to prove that the CORRECT SIMULATION, which would be > complete, doesn't ever reach a final state. T void DDD() { HHH(DDD); return; } You already know that a complete simulation of DDD by a pure x86 emulator cannot possibly reach its "return" instruction halt state. What makes an algorithm necessarily much more ignorant than you? It only needs to correctly predict the behavior of the complete simulation. Just like you and I, it does not have to do this complete simulation to make this correct prediction. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer