Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: True on the basis of meaning (and not any other kind)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 11:11:24 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <v977bc$gs40$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v8a4vf$uhll$1@dont-email.me> <v8aqh7$11ivs$1@dont-email.me> <v8cr4g$1gk19$1@dont-email.me> <v8dinp$1kii7$1@dont-email.me> <v8hv72$2mmsq$1@dont-email.me> <v8iisj$2qetj$1@dont-email.me> <v8kuhb$3d5q8$1@dont-email.me> <v8lc7p$3f6vr$2@dont-email.me> <v8naa8$3uo7s$1@dont-email.me> <v8nqo7$1n09$1@dont-email.me> <v8sm9o$1gk42$1@dont-email.me> <v8t2fl$1ilg6$2@dont-email.me> <v8v97m$2cofk$1@dont-email.me> <v8vusp$32fso$16@dont-email.me> <v91p95$3ppav$1@dont-email.me> <v92q4f$37e9$1@dont-email.me> <v94l1p$ldq7$1@dont-email.me> <v95c2j$p5rb$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 10:11:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5c6a761e1a568dd548fea8baecc84eb";
	logging-data="553088"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Urv88DLep5VQqh0WlOOyw"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Jab+MnJf5PZN2y8AmMntA8WkXTg=
Bytes: 3184

On 2024-08-09 15:19:47 +0000, olcott said:

> On 8/9/2024 3:46 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-08 16:01:19 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> 
>>> It does seem that he is all hung up on not understanding
>>> how the synonymity of bachelor and unmarried works.
>> 
>> What in the synonymity, other than the synonymity itself,
>> would be relevant to Quine's topic?
>> 
> 
> He mentions it 98 times in his paper
> https://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html
> I haven't looked at it in years.
> 
>>> I don't really give a rat's ass what he said all that matters
>>> to me is that I have defined expressions of language that are
>>> {true on the basis of their meaning expressed in language}
>>> so that I have analytic(Olcott) to make my other points.
>> 
>> That does not justify lying.
> 
> I never lie.

False pretence to know something whithout trying to find out whether
it is true is lying.

> Sometimes I make mistakes.

That is unavoidable. But mistakes must be correted when detected.
If someone claims that you have made a mistake then it is a iie
to repeat the alleged mistake without an attempt to check.

> It looks like you only want to dodge the actual
> topic with any distraction that you can find.

An error is an error even when you deviate from he topic.

> Expressions of language that are {true on the basis of
> their meaning expressed in this same language} defines
> analytic(Olcott) that overcomes any objections that
> anyone can possibly have about the analytic/synthetic
> distinction.

As long as you don't discuss the synthetic side and claimed border
cases you have not said anything about the distinction.

-- 
Mikko