Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 11:29:51 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <v978dv$h1ib$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8lem0$3ftpo$2@dont-email.me> <735401a612caec3eedb531311fd1e09b3d94521d@i2pn2.org> <v8lkdb$3h16a$1@dont-email.me> <5ee8b34a57f12b0630509183ffbd7c07804634b3@i2pn2.org> <v8ll4v$3h8m2$1@dont-email.me> <cbde765b8f9e769930b6c8589556907a41d9c256@i2pn2.org> <v8lm80$3h8m2$3@dont-email.me> <v8n6mq$3tv07$3@dont-email.me> <v8o14v$30uf$1@dont-email.me> <950d4eed7965040e841a970d48d5b6f417ff43dc@i2pn2.org> <v8oj1n$6kik$3@dont-email.me> <v8pvke$ih0a$1@dont-email.me> <4-qdnbdw1JzlRS37nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com> <v8v7p3$29r2r$1@dont-email.me> <v8vub1$32fso$14@dont-email.me> <1e1fa9bc4bbc00aa65c1a7974bd1bda87687c92b@i2pn2.org> <v90di8$38oni$1@dont-email.me> <47a76378d634bf0db4017f879d0160793b57125e@i2pn2.org> <v9161o$3gaju$1@dont-email.me> <b84374e766c199e1ba38ef1dc3bc8f6ab2c39dfc@i2pn2.org> <v91i97$3n4m0$1@dont-email.me> <v91unh$3rbor$1@dont-email.me> <v92gja$p1$3@dont-email.me> <v94m0l$ljf4$1@dont-email.me> <v95ae9$p5rb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 10:29:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5c6a761e1a568dd548fea8baecc84eb";
	logging-data="558667"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/tf1Vatsq1zEz3Gd0/4HL1"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IMG4GAD5YVMv+JArOjKnzyBpPS0=
Bytes: 3649

On 2024-08-09 14:51:51 +0000, olcott said:

> On 8/9/2024 4:03 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-08 13:18:34 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> void DDD()
>>> {
>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>    return;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> Each HHH of every HHH that can possibly exist definitely
>>> *emulates zero to infinity instructions correctly* In
>>> none of these cases does the emulated DDD ever reach
>>> its "return" instruction halt state.
>> 
>> The ranges of "each HHH" and "every HHH" are not defined above
>> so that does not really mean anything.
> 
> Here is something that literally does not mean anything:
> "0i34ine ir m0945r (*&ubYU  I*(ubn)I*054 gfdpodf["

Looks like encrypted text that might mean something.

> "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously"

This could be encrypted text, too, or perhaps refers to some
inside knowledge or convention.

> I defined an infinite set of HHH x86 emulators.

Maybe somewnete but not in the message I commented.

> I stipulated that each member of this set emulates
> zero to infinity instructions of DDD.

That doesn't restrict much.

> *I can't say it this way without losing 90% of my audience*
> Each element of this set is mapped to one element of the
> set of non-negative integers indicating the number of
> x86 instructions of DDD that it emulates.

It is easier to talk about mapping if is given a name.

> *This one seems to be good*
> Each element of this set corresponds to one element of
> the set of positive integers indicating the number of
> x86 instructions of DDD that it emulates.

That would mean that only a finite number (possibly zero) of
instructions is emulated. But the restriction to DDD does not
seem reasonable.

-- 
Mikko