Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never
 reaches its halt state ---
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 07:01:00 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <v97kps$kof0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8kp6s$3c5h2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8ld1f$3f6vr$5@dont-email.me> <v8ldl0$3ennf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lfb9$3g2jl$1@dont-email.me> <v8lgsr$3gadt$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8lhrr$3gkbk$1@dont-email.me> <v8n6un$3tv08$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8nums$1n09$6@dont-email.me> <v8vah7$29sva$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8vr7e$32fso$2@dont-email.me> <v91vc4$3qp1r$2@dont-email.me>
 <v92ge1$p1$2@dont-email.me>
 <f37108f5c9868fc309f42ef78982e2c865ad544c@i2pn2.org>
 <v940uh$hqmp$1@dont-email.me> <v94dir$jt3i$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9569q$o1gt$2@dont-email.me> <v95ch2$p7ls$1@dont-email.me>
 <v95fhp$q2jp$1@dont-email.me> <v95r1q$7ps5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v95vjo$60of$1@dont-email.me> <v97895$gh2a$2@dont-email.me>
 <v97j7u$ilah$3@dont-email.me>
 <03cabc6945effa1696e8ebfa691e6e661b896634@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 14:01:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec0d1ee71ceed677a7540299f25b1a73";
	logging-data="680416"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LUtO0wY5DPaPVqWCqGL8g"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vU1Vu+a08r+Z4DUS361GAASrgTo=
In-Reply-To: <03cabc6945effa1696e8ebfa691e6e661b896634@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3254

On 8/10/2024 6:48 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/10/24 7:34 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/10/2024 3:27 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 09.aug.2024 om 22:53 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 8/9/2024 2:35 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 09.aug.2024 om 18:19 schreef olcott:
>>>>
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>    return;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Each HHH of every HHH that can possibly exist definitely
>>>> emulates zero to infinity instructions of DDD correctly.
>>>> Every expert in the C language sees that this emulated DDD
>>>> cannot possibly reaches its own "return" instruction halt state.
>>> And you don't need to be an expert to see that this proves that all 
>>> these simulations are incorrect. 
>>
>> In other words you are trying to get away with the lie that
>> Richard has been persistently pushing:
>>
>> When N > 0 instructions of DDD are correctly emulated by HHH
>> then no instructions of DDD have been correctly emulated.
>>
> 
> No, that is just a lie you say about me.
> 

Your deceptive words confuse even you?
If the only correct simulation is a compete simulation that entails
this:
When N > 0 instructions of DDD are correctly emulated by HHH
then no instructions of DDD have been correctly emulated.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer