Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v984m3$mn9k$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:32:03 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 45 Message-ID: <v984m3$mn9k$3@dont-email.me> References: <GBEGTHyJnMpjHuJ0IoZO0OLSc1M@jntp> <AE2L2lzGJn13Z_4dg3bpJC59QsA@jntp> <66b3d79f$0$3656$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <dlVAS4dgp1D4i_LVHm3d5U9hqow@jntp> <43ee5c178f7ae877c0c3e00e77386494@www.novabbs.com> <xHQxwI0qFFk4RXIOP_V9qQEYF6o@jntp> <03be6498d21bfde3edbac3669f10841c@www.novabbs.com> <17ea67a48e5596d2$254537$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <df7a10a82cd895126e0d5ceafa835a8f@www.novabbs.com> <v983k7$mn9k$2@dont-email.me> <MZ-3-Ki6l-hJvQNpXF6G0CD2OLo@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:32:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c68c9b0e49d709379cb2ac2360b1bf3"; logging-data="744756"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NKjKXBj7bnjuT1SeOMuVz" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:q17mtndpUA8yh1rRMpU0Bo6jDvM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <MZ-3-Ki6l-hJvQNpXF6G0CD2OLo@jntp> Bytes: 3128 Le 10/08/2024 à 18:26, Richard Hachel a écrit : > Le 10/08/2024 à 18:14, Python a écrit : >> Le 10/08/2024 à 18:09, gharnagel a écrit : >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:29:23 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>> >>>> W dniu 10.08.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze: >>>> > >>>> > At first, Einstein was ignored, and it took quite a while for >>>> > the PTB to come around. But it didn't happen until experimental >>>> > evidence prevailed. >>>> >>>> Only such an idiot believe these nonsensical >>>> ideological lies, Harrie, and the mumble of >>>> the idiot was not even consistent. >>> >>> Wozzie has told so many lies, he can't discern truth from his >>> outrageous fantasies :-)) >> >> It is actually not a lie if he really believes his fallacious claims >> to be true. >> >> IMHO he is demented and dumb enough to actually believe his unsound >> "arguments". > > Ah, te voilà, toi? > > Je te croyais disparu sous la claque que tu t'es prise, et qui portait > sur Nostradamus. > > Je t'ai demandé d'expliquer le quatrain (ce que j'ai fait, et qui n'a > rien à voir avec tes conneries de Louis XIV) et de me montrer si, avec > tes immenses talents d'historiens ou de critique, tu pouvais me prouver > que cela avait été écris avant 1660. > Magnes toi un peu les couilles, au lieu de faire le con sur usenet. [for non French-speaking readers: M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand is babbling some unclear claims about Nostradamus' "predictions" here] I don't give a sh*t on this new stupid hobby of yours. I would, anyway, be concerned if I lived in Saint-Izan-de-Soudiac and a local country Doctor was fond of this kind of demented nonsense.