Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:40:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <v98q85$ue8i$3@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <f920592b-897c-48b9-a9af-80f25bc60e4b@att.net>
 <DDPks1ynTy6IhIWNHaxt25GM1v0@jntp>
 <c1f0efc8-04ca-4f2d-9820-cfd54c0eca73@att.net> <v90rp5$3dbpd$1@dont-email.me>
 <L8Pl0ELcnLfKVO0KrMmhSqDd-Y0@jntp> <v926ot$3tjq6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v93a8c$7o8h$1@dont-email.me> <v93eud$9abg$1@dont-email.me>
 <d4dd199f-088e-4b0e-b40e-a0f2366731e7@att.net>
 <hsF1KQs0AQ1chexm5WbqhBC9qdw@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 00:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4a54933427a42d7629aa5812cc9a6647";
	logging-data="997650"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ItGTXcAHvrjaBKBq24nPY2W9YGYmc6kA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yhtPD0U6sYrl2aMvoJnzFKhPI4E=
In-Reply-To: <hsF1KQs0AQ1chexm5WbqhBC9qdw@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2067

On 8/10/2024 8:59 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 09/08/2024 à 05:34, Jim Burns a écrit :
> 
>> and he thinks that
>> a set ordered with two ends is
>> more complete than
>> the same set with one or zero ends.
> 
> The set of unit fractions has two ends, namely at 1 and before 0.

They have no end for there are infinitely many of them. No unit fraction 
equals zero...

"Before" zero is a bit misleading? Why do you think the unit fractions 
"end" somewhere before zero? Wow. Are you trying to make your students 
wrong on purpose?

Btw, before zero makes me think of negative numbers for some reason. -1 
is before zero, 1 is after zero... ;^) lol.