Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v995pm$1cni$2@gal.iecc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!not-for-mail From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Instruction Tracing Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 01:57:10 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Taughannock Networks Message-ID: <v995pm$1cni$2@gal.iecc.com> References: <v970s3$flpo$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug10.121802@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 01:57:10 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="45810"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" In-Reply-To: <v970s3$flpo$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug10.121802@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Cleverness: some X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine) Bytes: 1972 Lines: 20 It appears that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> said: >(ROMP was also one of those RISC architectures that had delayed branches, >along with MIPS, HP-PA and I think SPARC as well.) > >I have heard it said that the RT PC was a poor advertisement for the >benefits of RISC, and the joke was made that “RT” stood for “Reduced >Technology”. I worked on AIX for the RT/PC. It was a pretty reasonable chip for the time, but it suffered greatly from internal IBM political fights which made it too little too late. AIX ran on top of a bloated virtual machine which made the whole thing too slow. There was skunkworks port of BSD that was supposed to be a lot better. As far as the delayed branches and such, they made sense in the narrow time window when it was too expensive to put a cache on a workstation but that time came and went by the time the RT shipped. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly