Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <v9II0xvyK9j0zcDw5uz2KwB14Y4@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <vsh92t$3mltr$1@dont-email.me>
 <d6b9dd687bfe1c27ced89d9c3657a2f5@www.novabbs.com> <vsj1ic$1bsmo$4@dont-email.me>
 <bde61d4704e1b6144732c8f6cf68e021@www.novabbs.com> <vslh71$52m4$3@dont-email.me>
 <1f71496841d33e33c17081dab4e92631@www.novabbs.com> <vsokjd$3felk$1@dont-email.me>
 <0ffd2692c0b472758475dd0a8ba91df1@www.novabbs.com> <vsqt2b$1s7ad$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: s74QprHw2QsJ-D3iB85adiMxCp0
JNTP-ThreadID: d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=v9II0xvyK9j0zcDw5uz2KwB14Y4@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 25 12:00:54 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-04-05T12:00:54Z/9266882"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2630
Lines: 24

Le 05/04/2025 à 11:27, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> Den 04.04.2025 23:15, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

>> Time dilation is not a phenomenon.
 
> "Time dilation" as predicted by SR is _proven_ to exist.

 The term "elasticity of time" is much more appropriate.
Otherwise, we should speak of the reciprocal dilation of chronotropy. And 
setting To' = To/sqrt(1-v²/c²)

Time elasticity is better and corresponds more to "real" life, because a 
measured time can be less than a proper time (which physicists seem to 
fail to understand, and I've never understood the incredible scientific 
inhibition they have about it (I've been saying this for 40 years).

The formula for time elasticity is, however, very simple and can be taught 
in school.
t' = t.(1+cosµ.v/c)/sqrt(1-v²/c²)
It's not that mathematicians can't understand this equation, nor that 
physicists can't grasp the concept; it's something else, psychological.

"We don't want this man and his concepts to rule over us."

R.H.