Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9b3dt$2remm$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 12:29:01 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <v9b3dt$2remm$2@dont-email.me> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <c1f0efc8-04ca-4f2d-9820-cfd54c0eca73@att.net> <v90rp5$3dbpd$1@dont-email.me> <L8Pl0ELcnLfKVO0KrMmhSqDd-Y0@jntp> <v926ot$3tjq6$1@dont-email.me> <v93a8c$7o8h$1@dont-email.me> <v93eud$9abg$1@dont-email.me> <d4dd199f-088e-4b0e-b40e-a0f2366731e7@att.net> <hsF1KQs0AQ1chexm5WbqhBC9qdw@jntp> <v9878m$o6nh$1@dont-email.me> <b2Y0K7upMzwRpIOuMOmFH4nQ_wg@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 21:29:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4a54933427a42d7629aa5812cc9a6647"; logging-data="2996950"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18RSFQHN3QMLmzbm/vHlu0q2jWTwCIYzJA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:oyP91HqTOIYUZmtmgiP6PTmCLH4= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <b2Y0K7upMzwRpIOuMOmFH4nQ_wg@jntp> Bytes: 1991 On 8/11/2024 5:24 AM, WM wrote: > Le 10/08/2024 à 19:16, FromTheRafters a écrit : >> WM expressed precisely : >>> Le 09/08/2024 à 05:34, Jim Burns a écrit : >>> >>>> and he thinks that >>>> a set ordered with two ends is >>>> more complete than >>>> the same set with one or zero ends. >>> >>> The set of unit fractions has two ends, namely at 1 and before 0. >> >> Wrong, > > Name unit fractions larger than 1 or smaller than 0. Smaller than zero? You just tack on a sign? ;^) > Note: Before domains without unit fractions the set has ended. > > Regards, WM > >