Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9cs1j$37g21$7@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space-time interval...
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:35:15 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <v9cs1j$37g21$7@dont-email.me>
References: <cOI7o74zjIF8ovb_Xa_pyXzRF28@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:35:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="179fc25bf81d98b6dc1b0fb0f08f54cc";
	logging-data="3391553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192R97ssXG1YXvC5+UFEG7D"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CmmHetZhGKbqPk1HjCV72ZrqGQA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <cOI7o74zjIF8ovb_Xa_pyXzRF28@jntp>
Bytes: 2472

Le 12/08/2024 à 11:27, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> What is the space-time interval?
> To describe it, mathematically, and not semantically,
> 
> because it may be an abstract construction requiring a complex number, 

You do have issues with complex numbers too (and linear equations, and
differential calculus, etc.) I know.

Anyway complex numbers are useless here. For once your are right on
something. But that stops there.

> we use the formula ds²=dl²-dt².
> 
> That doesn't make the "thing" much clearer.
> 
> We can then set ds²=dl²+i²dt²
> 
> But that doesn't make things any less clear.

https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/Book%3A_Introductory_Physics_-_Building_Models_to_Describe_Our_World_(Martin_Neary_Rinaldo_and_Woodman)/24%3A_The_Theory_of_Special_Relativity/24.06%3A_Lorentz_transformations_and_space-time

> I suggested setting fire to all that, not to bother with it anymore, to 
> leave the student alone for a while, and to never again use this 
> ridiculous, heavy and cumbersome notion in special relativity.
> We don't have it, and that's also what's terrible, despite the cries of 
> some aficionados who have no need for it.
> 
> So why this stupid fanaticism?
> Stockholm syndrome? The persecuted ends up adoring and glorifying his 
> tormentor?
> What's the point of all this?

You fail to understand because you are 1) an imbecile and 2) a stuffed
shirt, a pompous infatuated cretin.