Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:27:10 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <v9d2je$37g21$13@dont-email.me>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <277d12ea32119cb16056773223fe1a45@www.novabbs.com>
 <17e2ff3657424607$138252$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <8c5cae32d7b5302644e335db90064dec@www.novabbs.com>
 <17e31d9f0ea34274$12530$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <e0281ec04148bf85dfc7103c807d52c4@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ea6b2dc47c9dec$254539$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <921cee453f06f441f282c56122f8d2e9@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eab009eee746e7$255287$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <6ec22f20b2a177162a95f6456c430b21@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eab5fcab72b695$178520$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <f3602324d5cd9eb34b9f3e9aca92a7ca@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eabed887c83827$276277$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <9f6af7656d5b519c8b95ab67f993a029@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eae0fc5eb2eec9$255290$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <39ad13c20dc140d5dc3097e3365f7a35@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eafdd9bafb1cf1$233258$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:27:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="179fc25bf81d98b6dc1b0fb0f08f54cc";
	logging-data="3391553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195Lg572oBPdWNJgTE+xrX4"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PSK9i+WMx3TuWmjlGAVcYyP8N1Y=
In-Reply-To: <17eafdd9bafb1cf1$233258$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2573

Le 12/08/2024 à 15:21, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 12.08.2024 o 14:53, gharnagel pisze:
....
>> Wozniak doesn't say WHERE the measurement of the
>> satellite clock is made.  Of course,
> 
> Harrie lies and desperately tries
> to pretend that an answer different
> than "2024-08-31 17:00:00.00000000
> with the precision of an acceptable
> error" exists.

An answer "exists"?! Wtf?

> I've written it clearly: consider the
> simultaneity of the base. Not that it
> makes any difference 

Ah! This is a "everything goes" day for demented Wozniak.

I wonder if nurses can tell the difference.