Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:44:33 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <v9d3k1$3ajip$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v8a4vf$uhll$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8aqh7$11ivs$1@dont-email.me> <v8cr4g$1gk19$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8dinp$1kii7$1@dont-email.me> <v8hv72$2mmsq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8iisj$2qetj$1@dont-email.me> <v8kuhb$3d5q8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8lc7p$3f6vr$2@dont-email.me> <v8naa8$3uo7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8nqo7$1n09$1@dont-email.me> <v8sm9o$1gk42$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8t2fl$1ilg6$2@dont-email.me> <v8v97m$2cofk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8vusp$32fso$16@dont-email.me> <v91p95$3ppav$1@dont-email.me>
 <v92q4f$37e9$1@dont-email.me> <v94l1p$ldq7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v95c2j$p5rb$4@dont-email.me> <v95cke$p5rb$5@dont-email.me>
 <v977fo$gsru$1@dont-email.me> <v97goj$ielu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9c93e$35sg6$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:44:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0de40597f43653f20eea109a93bb850d";
	logging-data="3493465"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ktrq2CiBudObLlRbgtxDN"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MZGRvnqVAt1pHVUrZmlCFhoz+ik=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v9c93e$35sg6$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4460

On 8/12/2024 1:11 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-08-10 10:52:03 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 8/10/2024 3:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-08-09 15:29:18 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 8/9/2024 10:19 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 8/9/2024 3:46 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-08-08 16:01:19 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It does seem that he is all hung up on not understanding
>>>>>>> how the synonymity of bachelor and unmarried works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What in the synonymity, other than the synonymity itself,
>>>>>> would be relevant to Quine's topic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He mentions it 98 times in his paper
>>>>> https://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html
>>>>> I haven't looked at it in years.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't really give a rat's ass what he said all that matters
>>>>>>> to me is that I have defined expressions of language that are
>>>>>>> {true on the basis of their meaning expressed in language}
>>>>>>> so that I have analytic(Olcott) to make my other points.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That does not justify lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I never lie. Sometimes I make mistakes.
>>>>> It looks like you only want to dodge the actual
>>>>> topic with any distraction that you can find.
>>>>>
>>>>> Expressions of language that are {true on the basis of
>>>>> their meaning expressed in this same language} defines
>>>>> analytic(Olcott) that overcomes any objections that
>>>>> anyone can possibly have about the analytic/synthetic
>>>>> distinction.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Expressions of language that are {true on the basis of
>>>> their meaning expressed in this same language} defines
>>>> analytic(Olcott) that overcomes any objections that
>>>> anyone can possibly have about the analytic/synthetic
>>>> distinction.
>>>>
>>>> This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable or the
>>>> expression is simply untrue because it lacks a truthmaker.
>>>
>>> No, it doesn't. An algrithm or at least a proof of existence of an
>>> algrithm makes something computable. You  can't compute if you con't
>>> know how. The truth makeker of computability is an algorithm.
>>>
>>
>> There is either a sequence of truth preserving operations from
>> the set of expressions stipulated to be true (AKA the verbal
>> model of the actual world) to x or x is simply untrue. This is
>> how the Liar Paradox is best refuted.
> 
> Nice to see that you con't disagree.
> 

When the idea that I presented is fully understood
it abolishes the whole notion of undecidability.

My above idea is epistemological. Simply ignoring
epistemology does not make it go away.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer