Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error
 in all the proofs --- Mike
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:26:07 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <v9e5mg$3h0al$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v98uf7$vepo$1@dont-email.me>
 <60f1a533219c1237071f358999228eb48727f5e9@i2pn2.org>
 <v991tu$vepo$2@dont-email.me>
 <895f5e9b934bbfb72925fb109043500d49100a6a@i2pn2.org>
 <v994vs$10cfm$1@dont-email.me>
 <dec62801011bc5bf0b9eb9a62c607cf407198609@i2pn2.org>
 <v99870$14mlk$1@dont-email.me>
 <0f8f134fe961ee00910cce1d7f05b632d7567c6c@i2pn2.org>
 <v9abfu$2nabt$1@dont-email.me>
 <86c21e8a63450bf8b0c32f4f17ba0b503a914fe0@i2pn2.org>
 <v9d01i$39tbd$2@dont-email.me>
 <2c853efb65c3d8e2d4ba1c484f7002c74c68d895@i2pn2.org>
 <v9d1v8$3a9pe$1@dont-email.me>
 <e614d6b981fd5fa6eefc84894a14448d4663e3c7@i2pn2.org>
 <v9da2d$3bth4$1@dont-email.me>
 <64ddeeaa3a55a9e410de599bd8df53d3644ee5a3@i2pn2.org>
 <v9de0o$3cjse$1@dont-email.me> <v9dela$3cjse$2@dont-email.me>
 <b7c45ea22cb83908c31d909b67f4921156be52e3@i2pn2.org>
 <v9dgvl$3d1an$1@dont-email.me>
 <d289636b1d244acaf00108f46df093a9fd5aa27c@i2pn2.org>
 <v9dk2j$3dp9h$1@dont-email.me>
 <a30a6e85a930898cac3f6d2c2ff9a6f2da74ea0c@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 01:26:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5789d119f15570941a39cdb59159ffa5";
	logging-data="3703125"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18adfqRrGStGleXpNeVnwjn"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BgHt/wnSz9+vwMT72m6Idczp+pc=
In-Reply-To: <a30a6e85a930898cac3f6d2c2ff9a6f2da74ea0c@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4053

On 8/12/2024 6:10 PM, joes wrote:
> Am Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:25:23 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 8/12/2024 1:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/12/24 1:32 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 8/12/2024 12:12 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> YOU don't understand the rules of the x86 code, or don't care if you
>>>>> are wrong, as NOTHING in the x86 language allows the leaving of the
>>>>> direct exectuion thread and into showing the code the simulator being
>>>>> simulated is simulating. The ONLY correct answer is showing it doing
>>>>> the simulating.
>>>>>
>>>> I showed the first four lines of this code highlighted in red and you
>>>> ignored it. https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf
>>>
>>> No, you ignored my comments.
>>> First, that isn't a trace generated by HHH emulating DDD, but by x86UTM
>>> emulating HHH, so your claim is just a type error.
>>> Then when I look at this emulation, we see that HHH *ONLY* emulates
>>> those first 4 instructions of HHH and no more,
>> That is counter factual.
> It doesn't simulate the following call.
> 
>>> that it doesn't simulate what happens in HHH after the jmp 000015e7
>>> instruction, and thus you claim is still a LIE.
>> That is counter factual.
> Where does it jump to?
> 

Go look for yourself.

>>> It says that you have HHH simulate the first *8* instructions of the
>>> program DDD, and then stop doing a correct x86 emulation, and switches
>>> to an INCORRECT functional emulation, since it doesn't note that this
>>> emulation is CONDITIONAL.
>>>
>>>>> I HAVE pointed out the exact point you "correct emulation" deviates
>>>>> from the x86 requirments, > and you only answer seems to be that the
>>>>> x86 model of simulation gets too long. In other words, you logic
>>>>> system allows people to just LIE if they want to.
> 


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer