Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:46:27 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 105
Message-ID: <v9edtj$3fish$9@dont-email.me>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <17eab009eee746e7$255287$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <6ec22f20b2a177162a95f6456c430b21@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eab5fcab72b695$178520$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <f3602324d5cd9eb34b9f3e9aca92a7ca@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eabed887c83827$276277$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <9f6af7656d5b519c8b95ab67f993a029@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eae0fc5eb2eec9$255290$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <39ad13c20dc140d5dc3097e3365f7a35@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eafdd9bafb1cf1$233258$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <681e5da0c29b77655518c42513463f0a@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eb04e3816c19ec$263617$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <65a73d72df3e6413ef3bd691f93dfa8a@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eb0d581e6ab05b$286747$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <03d91192917665366eed4777e19eeaba@www.novabbs.com>
 <v9e72s$3fish$3@dont-email.me>
 <5ZudncmrKqWKOSf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v9e8hi$3fish$4@dont-email.me>
 <1vycnbIRxZctKif7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:46:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9cd82149b879d05bbfbcba58d7db48e8";
	logging-data="3656593"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18iXwCmwgiPx4+DAux8SXa2"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7iP4TW1YnZYHWOMNIOccGXPPcI0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1vycnbIRxZctKif7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 6299

Le 13/08/2024 à 03:32, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 08/12/2024 05:14 PM, Python wrote:
>> Le 13/08/2024 à 02:08, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>> On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
>>>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>>>>> ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>>>>> coming out about an afterlife,
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>>>>>
>>>>> he should really be worried about his future:
>>>>>
>>>>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>>>>> abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>>>>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>>>>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>>>>> with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>>>>> death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>>>
>>>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
>>> it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
>>> for your infantile in-group out-casting.
>>>
>>> It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
>>> popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
>>> that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
>>> eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.
>>>
>>> Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
>>> of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
>>> the deserved and the after-life according to morals
>>> doesn't mean much, to many.
>>>
>>> For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.
>>>
>>> There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
>>> that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
>>> might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
>>> vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
>>> both advise and are advised what's measure according to
>>> their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
>>> ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
>>> which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
>>> while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
>>> just, not the one most think they have.
>>
>> Ross, could you refrain from adding nonsense to nonsense? Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tODnCZvVtLg&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=15
> 
> The fall gravity is a great idea, though it does involve
> having a super-fluid and tachyonic model of flux,
> while theory today, has officially "no opinion, is the opinion",
> because otherwise gravitating bodies would constantly be doing
> work and violate conservation and perpetual motion, or
> rather perpetual work output of an otherwise closed system.
> 
> I think it's a good idea if you have the time and capacity,
> to consider something like d'Espagnat's Philosophy and Physics,
> as with respect to, Einstein's "model physicist" and "model
> philosopher", that as a theoretical physicist he talks about
> or rather writes about in his book that he left for us.
> 
> 
> If you don't know Bohm, David Bohm, particularly for Implicate
> Order, I'd say you're missing out, where Bohm-deBroglie and
> the pilot wave in quantum mechanics wave/particle duality wave
> theory, is a result of having all the data on the table.
> 
> So, I can just point to them, while at the same time,
> any good theory of everything physics-wise has to also
> be one mathematics-wise, for there to be one, at all.
> 
> So, fall gravity is a natural and given enough thought
> necessary feature of a theory where all the other usual
> principles of the theory of physics, which is only sum-of-histories
> sum-of-potentials and least action, all hold, all the time.
> 
> 
> Then, that the Parameterized Post-Newtonian _is_ the
> Ephemeris in effect, and is updated regularly,
> is a fact that is required to drive the updates to
> the clocks to the satellites in their orbits so that
> all the receivers at the ground-stations can be dirt-cheap
> solid-state simple-theory minders and keepers of you.
> 
> 

Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.