| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v9eirk$3fish$17@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality (defining numbers as half finite, half infinite) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 05:10:44 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 89 Message-ID: <v9eirk$3fish$17@dont-email.me> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <9822f5da-d61e-44ba-9d70-2850da971b42@att.net> <p36L63dXamDAkHDhkZhDKqx-h-o@jntp> <d8bbe664-a601-4590-9a7f-d5312b4dae54@att.net> <F6pqEi9Vg1YMcYTcIPQNs6NU_vI@jntp> <4f606ef2-ef6c-487b-b959-d109e374929f@att.net> <vpb42BOZYYy79eBYzCXpUbsjGQc@jntp> <f5086d19-ab91-429a-9dfe-2325e56c97a4@att.net> <6WIT-GYNvuMQ6ADdNvBdVKBkQ1c@jntp> <14c93f38-c155-44fe-a6ba-d0f143b374cc@att.net> <X_M4Fh6ty-vEi1nwWkFJ9udvMEg@jntp> <b27e0f43-9dfd-4bfb-a407-12c9d23e6d8f@att.net> <Vl2dnVxvxeF3Dyz7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <11945561-d74f-43b2-ab36-c1f339cb6df4@att.net> <GDqdnVIpbZzWHS_7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <4d094700-b081-4b0d-90e0-0e8d3f3f1f9d@att.net> <v8ufkr$1uopk$4@dont-email.me> <XaOdnVAWSL2lQS_7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <GwSdnbb0nMloUCf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 05:10:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9cd82149b879d05bbfbcba58d7db48e8"; logging-data="3656593"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lQ60pIhBIQFV8fvr5KjJ6" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:0sPKQGChE6KpCVUhJL9+9wpnqCw= In-Reply-To: <GwSdnbb0nMloUCf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 5300 Le 13/08/2024 à 05:07, Ross Finlayson a écrit : > On 08/06/2024 07:30 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 08/06/2024 05:37 PM, Moebius wrote: >>> Am 07.08.2024 um 02:27 schrieb Jim Burns: >>> >>>> however things stand with supertasks, [...] >>> >>> Here my 2 cents: Some "supertasks" (thought experiment) DO lead*) to a >>> specific "final result" (from a "logical" point of view), some NOT. >>> >>> Thomson's Lamp is of the latter type. >>> >>> It's final state is simply not "determined" by all it's "earlier" >>> states. >>> >>> _____________________ >>> >>> *) in a certain sense; usually considering some additional assumptions. >> >> In nature, in the very heart of the nucleus of the atom, >> where according to plain mathematics the most concentrated >> force of the strong nuclear force that holds the atom's >> nucleus together would be, is: "asymptotic freedom". >> >> As a supertask, according to induction, in the concentric >> model of the force that is the binding energy that holds >> together the very substance of matter itself, in the theory, >> is "asymptotic freedom". >> >> This is as was theorized by Salam and Weinberg in the 1970's, >> and within a few years for which prizes in physics were awarded. >> >> The geometric series, Zeno's, adds up to one. Of course, in >> nature, in the mesoscale or the classical, that's always >> perfectly true. >> >> >> The idea that there are anti-inductive results in the >> infinitary, is even a bit stronger than the usual apeiron >> or non-results in the infinitary, though, the most usual >> combined inductive and deductive results, about the >> infinitely-divisible in a space, are most strong. >> >> That is to say, calculus is imperfect and only at best >> a close approximation and always with a non-zero error term, >> except in the infinite limit, where it is perfect, and, >> it not only goes to that once, it must be that it goes to >> that all the many times, because we don't merely have a >> fundamental theorem of differentiation, yet a fundamental >> theorem of integration, which sums no less than infinitely >> many areas to be correct in the usual sense, and no less. >> >> >> These days some peopls don't even know that various >> conjectures of Goldbach in the number-theoretic, or >> about the lengths of arithmetic progressions or Szemeredi, >> are rather formally undecide-able and with models of >> standard and non-standard integers, both fragments >> and extensions, both so and not so. >> >> >> Then, induction, alone, does not suffice, and, >> deduction, together with properties of the space >> like constancy in measure and proportion in relation, >> make so that the geometric series has a sum. >> >> Calculus is only correct in the _infinite_ limit. >> >> >> Then, for mathematical platonists, that must be real >> somehow, just like there's no perfect circle, yet there >> is, an object of mathematics, there's infinity, >> an object of mathematics. >> >> >> Then, results in the non-standard like summing the >> geometric series or Zeno's, or everyone's favorite >> first non-standard not-a-real-function Dirac's delta, >> which you can notice on the Wiki is called a "function", >> again, continue. >> >> > Ross, could you reach friends? Family? Any kind of social service professionals? Neighborhoods? Whatever. You are not going well AT ALL.