Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9eirk$3fish$17@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality (defining numbers as half finite, half
 infinite)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 05:10:44 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 89
Message-ID: <v9eirk$3fish$17@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <9822f5da-d61e-44ba-9d70-2850da971b42@att.net>
 <p36L63dXamDAkHDhkZhDKqx-h-o@jntp>
 <d8bbe664-a601-4590-9a7f-d5312b4dae54@att.net>
 <F6pqEi9Vg1YMcYTcIPQNs6NU_vI@jntp>
 <4f606ef2-ef6c-487b-b959-d109e374929f@att.net>
 <vpb42BOZYYy79eBYzCXpUbsjGQc@jntp>
 <f5086d19-ab91-429a-9dfe-2325e56c97a4@att.net>
 <6WIT-GYNvuMQ6ADdNvBdVKBkQ1c@jntp>
 <14c93f38-c155-44fe-a6ba-d0f143b374cc@att.net>
 <X_M4Fh6ty-vEi1nwWkFJ9udvMEg@jntp>
 <b27e0f43-9dfd-4bfb-a407-12c9d23e6d8f@att.net>
 <Vl2dnVxvxeF3Dyz7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <11945561-d74f-43b2-ab36-c1f339cb6df4@att.net>
 <GDqdnVIpbZzWHS_7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <4d094700-b081-4b0d-90e0-0e8d3f3f1f9d@att.net> <v8ufkr$1uopk$4@dont-email.me>
 <XaOdnVAWSL2lQS_7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <GwSdnbb0nMloUCf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 05:10:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9cd82149b879d05bbfbcba58d7db48e8";
	logging-data="3656593"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lQ60pIhBIQFV8fvr5KjJ6"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0sPKQGChE6KpCVUhJL9+9wpnqCw=
In-Reply-To: <GwSdnbb0nMloUCf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5300

Le 13/08/2024 à 05:07, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 08/06/2024 07:30 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 08/06/2024 05:37 PM, Moebius wrote:
>>> Am 07.08.2024 um 02:27 schrieb Jim Burns:
>>>
>>>> however things stand with supertasks, [...]
>>>
>>> Here my 2 cents: Some "supertasks" (thought experiment) DO lead*) to a
>>> specific "final result" (from a "logical" point of view), some NOT.
>>>
>>> Thomson's Lamp is of the latter type.
>>>
>>> It's final state is simply not "determined" by all it's "earlier" 
>>> states.
>>>
>>> _____________________
>>>
>>> *) in a certain sense; usually considering some additional assumptions.
>>
>> In nature, in the very heart of the nucleus of the atom,
>> where according to plain mathematics the most concentrated
>> force of the strong nuclear force that holds the atom's
>> nucleus together would be, is: "asymptotic freedom".
>>
>> As a supertask, according to induction, in the concentric
>> model of the force that is the binding energy that holds
>> together the very substance of matter itself, in the theory,
>> is "asymptotic freedom".
>>
>> This is as was theorized by Salam and Weinberg in the 1970's,
>> and within a few years for which prizes in physics were awarded.
>>
>> The geometric series, Zeno's, adds up to one. Of course, in
>> nature, in the mesoscale or the classical, that's always
>> perfectly true.
>>
>>
>> The idea that there are anti-inductive results in the
>> infinitary, is even a bit stronger than the usual apeiron
>> or non-results in the infinitary, though, the most usual
>> combined inductive and deductive results, about the
>> infinitely-divisible in a space, are most strong.
>>
>> That is to say, calculus is imperfect and only at best
>> a close approximation and always with a non-zero error term,
>> except in the infinite limit, where it is perfect, and,
>> it not only goes to that once, it must be that it goes to
>> that all the many times, because we don't merely have a
>> fundamental theorem of differentiation, yet a fundamental
>> theorem of integration, which sums no less than infinitely
>> many areas to be correct in the usual sense, and no less.
>>
>>
>> These days some peopls don't even know that various
>> conjectures of Goldbach in the number-theoretic, or
>> about the lengths of arithmetic progressions or Szemeredi,
>> are rather formally undecide-able and with models of
>> standard and non-standard integers, both fragments
>> and extensions, both so and not so.
>>
>>
>> Then, induction, alone, does not suffice, and,
>> deduction, together with properties of the space
>> like constancy in measure and proportion in relation,
>> make so that the geometric series has a sum.
>>
>> Calculus is only correct in the _infinite_ limit.
>>
>>
>> Then, for mathematical platonists, that must be real
>> somehow, just like there's no perfect circle, yet there
>> is, an object of mathematics, there's infinity,
>> an object of mathematics.
>>
>>
>> Then, results in the non-standard like summing the
>> geometric series or Zeno's, or everyone's favorite
>> first non-standard not-a-real-function Dirac's delta,
>> which you can notice on the Wiki is called a "function",
>> again, continue.
>>
>>
> 

Ross, could you reach friends? Family? Any kind of social
service professionals? Neighborhoods? Whatever. You are not
going well AT ALL.